The deciding factor is the slow feedback loop, not task size: the ui
package needs CGO and the MSYS2 toolchain, and a cold test run took 258s
during the review. Getting an edit right on the first pass is worth more
than generating it faster.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Records the findings of a review of the whole test suite: three duplicate
tests confirmed by comparing coverage profiles, two inaccuracies in
TESTS.md, a hand-rolled itoa in seed_test.go, and four tests thin enough
to need a decision.
Also lists the pairs that share a coverage profile but assert different
properties, and the functions whose zero coverage is deliberate, so a
later pass does not re-report them. Temporary: delete once the items are
done or moved to ROADMAP.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>