Files
gosentry/docs/PERFORMANCE.md
T
mixeme 711cb73ea5 docs: record startup-time research; plan re-check after Fyne 2.7.x
Add docs/PERFORMANCE.md documenting the post-Phase-4 startup slowdown:
the ~290ms increase is entirely Fyne 2.5.3->2.6.3's w.Show() cost, not
the Service/domain/UI refactor. Includes the GOSENTRY_TIMING method and
warm-run results table so it can be reproduced.

Wire the startup re-measurement into the existing Fyne 2.6.3->2.7.x
upgrade task in ROADMAP.md so 2.7's effect on w.Show() gets checked.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-22 00:31:31 +03:00

2.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Performance Notes

Measured performance findings for GoSentry. Each entry records the method so the numbers can be reproduced and re-checked after relevant changes.

Startup Time

Finding (2026-06-22)

After the Phase 4 refactor, cold startup time (the History "Window shown in …" metric) increased by ~290 ms. The increase is caused entirely by the Fyne v2.5.3 → v2.6.3 upgrade (task T4.1), not by the Service / domain / UI restructuring.

Method

Env-gated phase timers (GOSENTRY_TIMING) were added across the startup path (Run in src/ui/run.go and newMainView in src/ui/mainwindow.go) and the equivalent points in the pre-refactor entry point (src/gui/app.go at commit c5e0ef9, the last commit before T4.1). Both were built with the CGO / MSYS2 UCRT64 toolchain and run 5× each; the first run of each is a cold-disk outlier and is excluded. The timed span (startedw.Show()) is identical in both builds, so the comparison is fair.

Results (warm-run averages)

Phase (cumulative from start) Old (Fyne 2.5.3) New (Fyne 2.6.3) Δ
after single-instance check ~0.5 ms ~0.6 ms
after Fyne app + window + tray ~277 ms ~285 ms +8 ms
app.Open() done +3 ms +3 ms 0
views built + svc.Start() +42 ms +43 ms ~0
after SetContent ~348 ms ~353 ms +5 ms
after w.Show() (TOTAL) ~348 ms ~644 ms +~290 ms

Interpretation

  • Everything up to and including SetContent costs the same in both versions (~350 ms). The refactor-specific code — app.Open() (~3 ms) and the new app.Service plus view construction (~42 ms) — is unchanged, so the restructuring added no measurable startup cost.
  • The entire regression lands in w.Show(): ~0 ms under Fyne 2.5.3, ~290 ms under 2.6.3. Fyne 2.6 reworked main-thread marshaling (the change that introduced fyne.Do) and front-loads first-window GL/driver realization into the Show() call.
  • The cost is a fixed, one-time Fyne expense, not a leak in GoSentry code, and the upgrade cannot be reverted because fyne.Do requires Fyne ≥ 2.6.
  • The tray / autostart path (--start-in-tray) skips w.Show() until the user opens the window, so it is unaffected.

Next check

Re-measure with the same method after the planned Fyne 2.6.3 → 2.7.x upgrade (see ROADMAP.md → Tray Interaction). The goal is to learn whether 2.7's driver/threading changes recover any of the ~290 ms w.Show() cost or hold it steady. Reuse the GOSENTRY_TIMING instrumentation pattern above; do not commit the temporary timers.