release: 1.9.2: Review pass: port-25 milters, DMARC validation, rate-limit fix

Review pass over `1.4.0`…`1.9.1`: port 25 no longer shares the submission milter chain, DMARC reports are validated before they are stored, and the auto rate limit is correct for a non-default level-1 window. Schema migration `0010` (index only). Upgrading is a tag bump.
Added:
  - SQLite migration `0010_send_log_app_login_index.sql` —
  - DMARC aggregate reports are accepted as **zip** as well as gzip or plain XML
  - e2e: `checkPort25ConfigCombinations` regenerates the Postfix configuration
Changed:
  - README hero line and a **Positioning** block in `docs/product.md` record the
Fixed:
  - The setup account's password is hashed at bcrypt cost `12` like every other
  - Login/setup rate limiter: protecting blocked buckets from eviction is now
  - `postqueue -p` output is bounded to 4 MiB (the timeout alone left the size of
  - [schema-migrations.md](docs/schema-migrations.md): the schema section was
  - postqueue reader is now time-bounded: `postqueue -p` runs under a 5-second
  … (11 more in CHANGELOG)
Changed:
  - [roadmap.md](docs/roadmap.md) now carries everything the 2026-08-19 code
  - Extracted `internal/configsafe` — the empty-value and forbidden-character
  - Build, deploy and migration comments no longer cite the archived
  - Dropped the `parseDomainRateLimitForm` / `parseAppRateLimitForm` pass-through
  - Extracted shared helpers: `internal/atomicfile` (atomic temp-write+rename) and
  … (7 more in CHANGELOG)
Removed:
  - Unused legacy asset `docs/assets/icon.png` (superseded by the four brand SVGs
  - Plan documents for already-shipped features: `domain-stats-auto-ratelimit`,

Full detail: CHANGELOG.md (1.9.2).
This commit is contained in:
mix
2026-09-22 15:24:53 +03:00
parent 967d3d95de
commit 7ef7f75246
179 changed files with 11558 additions and 1738 deletions
+13 -2
View File
@@ -22,6 +22,15 @@ so we can compare approaches before committing.
reference to them) under `/data`, retention, release workflow, and a wider
attack/backup surface — closer to "mini-mailbox" than pure relay.
## Mockup
A target look is drawn — list and detail —
[in-quarantine](../assets/panel-redesign/panel/in-quarantine.html),
[in-quarantine-message](../assets/panel-redesign/panel/in-quarantine-message.html)
— under the design contract of [panel-redesign.md](panel-redesign.md). It
assumes answers to the questions below (SelfPost holds the mail, release goes
to the upstream, 14 days, headers only in the panel); it does not settle them.
## Open questions (to decide before a checklist)
1. **Where mail lives**
@@ -43,7 +52,8 @@ attack/backup surface — closer to "mini-mailbox" than pure relay.
## Context (as-built)
- Inbound relay forwards or rejects; no local delivery ([inbound-relay.md](inbound-relay.md)).
- Inbound relay forwards or rejects; no local delivery
([architecture.md](../architecture.md) § Mail path).
- Optional `INBOUND_ANTISPAM_MILTER` — external rspamd may quarantine on its
own today, without panel integration.
- DMARC `p=quarantine` is unrelated (outbound policy for receivers).
@@ -56,7 +66,8 @@ attack/backup surface — closer to "mini-mailbox" than pure relay.
## Dependencies
- [inbound-relay.md](inbound-relay.md) (shipped).
- Inbound relay, shipped in `[1.4.0]` — as built in
[architecture.md](../architecture.md) § Mail path.
- Sensible to decide **after** or **alongside**
[inbound-antispam-panel.md](inbound-antispam-panel.md) (journal/lists), but
not blocked on it for design discussion.