findings of the reviews of audit stage 2b
Technical review (Opus) and security review (Fable) of 5be109b..5154bba;
reports in the session's scratchpad. Nothing above low from security; one
bug and three risks from the technical review. Migration 0009 is not
deployed, so it was extended.
- Bug: two refusals of one second swapped their NOQUEUE lines (each line
went to the newest lineless row). AttachRefusalLine now matches the
client address too (send_log.client_ip, written by the journal milter -
Postfix's line names the client and the sender, never the login: the
sasl_username part of the pattern never matched and could be fed by HELO,
security F1/F2), takes the nearest row in time and the oldest of equals,
and a line already on a row goes on no other (security F6).
- Waiting lines and recoveries lived only in memory while the saved offset
moved past them: a stop within 30 s lost them. The tracker now never saves
an offset past the oldest waiting item in its file (tracker.hold,
refusalLines.oldest) - for a recovery, the client= line that names its
login - so they are read again; the "once" guards make that harmless.
- A recovered row whose login the tailer did not see was nobody's: its
domain_id falls back to the envelope domain's.
- The fingerprint's file identity is the inode alone: the device number can
change across a host reboot and make the same log look rotated.
- A refused row carries its queue id; UpdateStatus's "newest row" now skips
refused rows, so a later message with that id does not flip it to sent.
- The alive mark: its age is read first and kept from then on, so asking
supervisord for 30 s cannot make it stale; the entrypoint removes it with
the sockets - a container restart is not the check's downtime, and a mark
from before would have counted the whole outage as "≈".
- Security F3: the sender check prints no ";" of the client's in the From:
text of its reply, and the tailer reads the envelope after the first ";"
- Postfix's own text.
- A refused row with a queue id and no stored lines says so (it was told the
mail.log text of 2.2.0); the fact's em dash is the house hyphen.
- Docs: architecture (client address, no login), guide § Health (warns on
either count), help topics log and sender-check (design 1ca87f2).
- e2e: refusals_show_postfixs_line wants the refusal's own sender in the
line; refusal_recovered_from_the_log waits past the tailer's 30 s and
checks that a refusal the panel wrote got no recovered twin.
Not changed, written down: review 9 (mail.log.1 read to its end at that
moment; postlogd may still write to it until the reload), 10 (a log under
512 bytes has no fingerprint, so places fall back to time briefly after a
rotation), 6 (a 451 at MAIL FROM of another milter reads the same - the
client and sender must match too now), security F5/F12 (info). Review 12:
the refused and closed-by-the-panel variants of out-message were shown to
the owner as pictures of the real templates, not drawn in out-message.html:
the guard ties every drawn screen to a page of the engine, and a variant
has the page's outline.
Evidence on the test server for this tree: go vet clean, go test ./... 23
packages ok, make e2e exit 0 (refusal_recovered_from_the_log 70 s).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
+33
-19
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ type SendLogEntry struct {
|
||||
// was refused (Reason*), and for ReasonFrom what its From: line said.
|
||||
Reason string
|
||||
HeaderFrom string
|
||||
// ClientIP is the client a refusal at MAIL FROM came from (InsertRejected
|
||||
// only), which Postfix's line about it names.
|
||||
ClientIP string
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// loginDomainID is the domain_id a row is written with: the domain of the
|
||||
@@ -73,9 +76,9 @@ func (s *Store) InsertRejected(e SendLogEntry) error {
|
||||
now := time.Now().UTC().Format(time.RFC3339)
|
||||
_, err := s.db.Exec(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO send_log
|
||||
(queue_id, domain, app_login, from_addr, to_addr, subject, status, reason, header_from, created_at, updated_at, domain_id)
|
||||
VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, `+loginDomainID+`)`,
|
||||
e.QueueID, e.Domain, e.AppLogin, e.From, e.To, e.Subject, StatusRejected, e.Reason, e.HeaderFrom, now, now, e.AppLogin,
|
||||
(queue_id, domain, app_login, from_addr, to_addr, subject, status, reason, header_from, client_ip, created_at, updated_at, domain_id)
|
||||
VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, `+loginDomainID+`)`,
|
||||
e.QueueID, e.Domain, e.AppLogin, e.From, e.To, e.Subject, StatusRejected, e.Reason, e.HeaderFrom, e.ClientIP, now, now, e.AppLogin,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("insert rejected send_log: %w", err)
|
||||
@@ -113,7 +116,9 @@ func (s *Store) UpdateStatus(queueID, recipient, status string) (int64, error) {
|
||||
return 0, fmt.Errorf("update send_log status: %w", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
defer tx.Rollback()
|
||||
const newest = `id = (SELECT MAX(id) FROM send_log WHERE queue_id = ? AND to_addr = ? COLLATE NOCASE)`
|
||||
// A refused row carries the queue id it was given, and that id may be the
|
||||
// next message's: a delivery line is never about a refusal.
|
||||
const newest = `id = (SELECT MAX(id) FROM send_log WHERE queue_id = ? AND to_addr = ? COLLATE NOCASE AND status <> 'rejected')`
|
||||
marked, err := tx.Exec(
|
||||
`UPDATE send_log SET reason = ? WHERE `+newest+` AND reason = ?`,
|
||||
ReasonReconcileContradicted, queueID, recipient, ReasonReconcile,
|
||||
@@ -235,22 +240,27 @@ type SendLogRow struct {
|
||||
|
||||
// AttachRefusalLine puts Postfix's line about a refusal at MAIL FROM on the
|
||||
// row the journal milter wrote for it (audit 2026-10-12, stage 2b). Such a
|
||||
// refusal has no queue id, so the row is found by what the line says: a
|
||||
// refused row of that sender - and login, when the line names one - without a
|
||||
// line yet, written within two minutes of the line's time; the newest when
|
||||
// there are several. It reports whether a row took the line.
|
||||
func (s *Store) AttachRefusalLine(login, from string, at time.Time, line string) (bool, error) {
|
||||
// refusal has no queue id, and the line names no login, so the row is found
|
||||
// by what the line says: a refused row of that client and sender without a
|
||||
// line yet, written within two minutes of the line's time; the nearest in
|
||||
// time, the oldest of equals, when there are several - lines are read in the
|
||||
// order the rows were written, so two refusals of one second take one line
|
||||
// each in turn (review of stage 2b). A line already on a row - read again
|
||||
// after a restart - goes on no other. It reports whether a row took the line.
|
||||
func (s *Store) AttachRefusalLine(clientIP, from string, at time.Time, line string) (bool, error) {
|
||||
res, err := s.db.Exec(
|
||||
`UPDATE send_log SET refusal_line = ? WHERE id = (
|
||||
`UPDATE send_log SET refusal_line = ?1 WHERE id = (
|
||||
SELECT id FROM send_log
|
||||
WHERE status = ? AND queue_id = '' AND refusal_line = ''
|
||||
AND reason IN ('', ?, ?) AND from_addr = ? COLLATE NOCASE
|
||||
AND (? = '' OR app_login = ?)
|
||||
AND created_at BETWEEN ? AND ?
|
||||
ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 1)`,
|
||||
line, StatusRejected, ReasonLimit, ReasonClient, from, login, login,
|
||||
WHERE status = ?2 AND queue_id = '' AND refusal_line = ''
|
||||
AND reason IN ('', ?3, ?4) AND from_addr = ?5 COLLATE NOCASE AND client_ip = ?6
|
||||
AND created_at BETWEEN ?7 AND ?8
|
||||
ORDER BY ABS(julianday(created_at) - julianday(?9)), id
|
||||
LIMIT 1)
|
||||
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM send_log WHERE refusal_line = ?1)`,
|
||||
line, StatusRejected, ReasonLimit, ReasonClient, from, clientIP,
|
||||
at.Add(-refusalLineWindow).UTC().Format(time.RFC3339),
|
||||
at.Add(refusalLineWindow).UTC().Format(time.RFC3339),
|
||||
at.UTC().Format(time.RFC3339),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return false, fmt.Errorf("attach refusal line: %w", err)
|
||||
@@ -264,16 +274,20 @@ func (s *Store) AttachRefusalLine(login, from string, at time.Time, line string)
|
||||
// wrote the row itself (audit 2026-10-12, stage 2b): the check answers 550
|
||||
// and writes the row through a buffer a moment later. The message had a queue
|
||||
// id; a refused row with that id from around at means the row was written,
|
||||
// and nothing is. It reports whether it wrote one.
|
||||
// and nothing is. The domain is the login's, or - when the tailer did not see the login, its
|
||||
// client= line read before a restart - the envelope's, so the row is still
|
||||
// its domain's administrator's (review of stage 2b). It reports whether it
|
||||
// wrote one.
|
||||
func (s *Store) RecoverRefusal(e SendLogEntry, at time.Time) (bool, error) {
|
||||
stamp := at.UTC().Format(time.RFC3339)
|
||||
res, err := s.db.Exec(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO send_log
|
||||
(queue_id, domain, app_login, from_addr, to_addr, subject, status, reason, header_from, recovered, created_at, updated_at, domain_id)
|
||||
SELECT ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, '', ?, ?, ?, 1, ?, ?, `+loginDomainID+`
|
||||
SELECT ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, '', ?, ?, ?, 1, ?, ?,
|
||||
COALESCE(`+loginDomainID+`, (SELECT d.id FROM domains d WHERE d.name = ?))
|
||||
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM send_log
|
||||
WHERE queue_id = ? AND status = ? AND created_at BETWEEN ? AND ?)`,
|
||||
e.QueueID, e.Domain, e.AppLogin, e.From, e.To, StatusRejected, e.Reason, e.HeaderFrom, stamp, stamp, e.AppLogin,
|
||||
e.QueueID, e.Domain, e.AppLogin, e.From, e.To, StatusRejected, e.Reason, e.HeaderFrom, stamp, stamp, e.AppLogin, e.Domain,
|
||||
e.QueueID, StatusRejected,
|
||||
at.Add(-refusalLineWindow).UTC().Format(time.RFC3339), at.Add(refusalLineWindow).UTC().Format(time.RFC3339),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user