panel-redesign: technical review - every page re-shot and audited

Stage 3, step 1 (Opus). Each step of stage 2 was reviewed against its
mockup when it landed; this closes the review over the whole, after the
changes of stage 3 (Help topics and the ? on boxes, the three-choice
report address, row actions, the filter's socket).

  - Evidence: all 29 screenshots under docs/assets/panel-redesign/
    evidence/ are re-shot from the current templates - the 28 pages of
    pageFixtures and the sign-in page without an administrator - 1440 px
    wide at each page's full height. Headless Edge against the real
    templates served locally with their fixtures; NOT from the container
    (no Docker on this machine) - the container is checked on the test
    server at deployment.
  - panel/audit.js over the same 29 pages at 1440 and 1280: 4160 texts
    checked, problems: [] (type floor, contrast, sideways scroll,
    overflow in boxes and heads, scrolling tables, clipped card values,
    missing icons). Every ? link has the form /help#topic, and
    TestEveryHelpLinkLandsOnATopic proves each lands.
  - Guards: outlines, class vocabulary, page structure, components-only,
    stylesheet equality, routes, static allow-list - green; the ratchet
    is empty.

Where the product knowingly differs from a mockup (each recorded in the
commit of its step): the queue is the postqueue listing, not a table;
the outbound log has no status filter; the message history has no
"accepted from IP" step; Health draws the sockets this server has;
the Spam filter box states only what the configuration says; the user
form's e-mail help promises nothing that is not built; Overview's title
does not claim that mail is flowing. Roadmap screens (in-log, in-queue,
in-quarantine, in-filter-lists, preflight) are drawn and not built.

Open with the owner: is-hidden, which panel.js sets at run time, is not
in check.py's Bulma subset (the edit of check.py is his).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/plans/panel-redesign.md

@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ only when both are done. Every stage-2 step ends with the evidence of
 
 **Stage 3 — reviews, docs, 2.0.0**
 
-- [ ] Technical review of the whole against the mockups, evidence pairs complete — **Opus**
+- [x] Technical review of the whole against the mockups, evidence pairs complete — **Opus**
 - [x] Security review of the route rename, subtree authorization and inbound delegation — **Fable**
 - [x] guide.md screenshots and wording for the new navigation; architecture.md § Panel HTTP surface and § Persistence; security.md roles; *Removed* in the CHANGELOG with one line that 2.0 starts from an empty data directory; strike the three UI rows of review-2026-08-followups that the redesign retires — **Sonnet**
 - [ ] `go vet`, `go test ./...`, e2e suite; version cut `2.0.0` — **Haiku**

docs/roadmap.md

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ in `git log` and [CHANGELOG.md](../CHANGELOG.md).
 | panel-notifications | E-mail notifications about important events | candidate | — | — |
 | delivery-log-storage | Keep a message's `mail.log` lines with its send-log row | candidate | — | — |
 | password-reset | Password reset by e-mail | candidate | — | — |
-| panel-redesign | Panel redesign (accepted mockups, design contract) | agreed | 25/27 | [plans/panel-redesign.md](plans/panel-redesign.md) |
+| panel-redesign | Panel redesign (accepted mockups, design contract) | agreed | 26/27 | [plans/panel-redesign.md](plans/panel-redesign.md) |
 | schema-squash | Squash SQLite migrations into a 2.x baseline | built in panel-redesign (stage 1) | — | [plans/panel-redesign.md](plans/panel-redesign.md) |
 
 **Recommended order** (not binding; owner, 2026-10-09: feature order follows