Fix DMARC guidance for send-only relays with optional rua= settings.
test / test (push) Has been cancelled
test / test (push) Has been cancelled
The panel now suggests policy-only DMARC by default, lets operators configure a default and per-domain report address, and DNS-checks hub _report._dmarc records. Future in-panel report ingestion is tracked as dmarc-reports in the roadmap. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ package dnscheck
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"context"
|
||||
"database/sql"
|
||||
"strings"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,8 +19,6 @@ func TestSPFExample(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
{"ipv4", "mail.example.com", []string{"203.0.113.10"}, "v=spf1 ip4:203.0.113.10 -all"},
|
||||
{"both families", "mail.example.com", []string{"203.0.113.10", "2001:db8::1"},
|
||||
"v=spf1 ip4:203.0.113.10 ip6:2001:db8::1 -all"},
|
||||
// The hostname does not resolve, so there is no address to name; an "a:"
|
||||
// mechanism still gives the operator a publishable record.
|
||||
{"no addresses", "mail.example.com", nil, "v=spf1 a:mail.example.com -all"},
|
||||
{"unparsable addresses", "mail.example.com", []string{"not-an-ip"}, "v=spf1 a:mail.example.com -all"},
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -32,6 +31,41 @@ func TestSPFExample(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestDMARCExample(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if got := DMARCExample(""); got != "v=DMARC1; p=none" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("empty = %q", got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
want := "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:reports@hub.example"
|
||||
if got := DMARCExample("reports@hub.example"); got != want {
|
||||
t.Errorf("with rua = %q, want %q", got, want)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestResolveDMARCRua(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
inherit := sql.NullString{}
|
||||
if got := ResolveDMARCRua(inherit, "a@b.com"); got != "a@b.com" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("inherit profile = %q", got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
none := sql.NullString{Valid: true}
|
||||
if got := ResolveDMARCRua(none, "a@b.com"); got != "" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("explicit none = %q", got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
custom := sql.NullString{Valid: true, String: "x@y.com"}
|
||||
if got := ResolveDMARCRua(custom, "a@b.com"); got != "x@y.com" {
|
||||
t.Errorf("custom = %q", got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestExternalReportAuth(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
name, value, ok := ExternalReportAuth("shop.com", "reports@hub.com")
|
||||
if !ok || name != "_report._dmarc.hub.com" || value != "v=DMARC1;" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("external = (%q, %q, %v)", name, value, ok)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, _, ok := ExternalReportAuth("shop.com", "dmarc@shop.com"); ok {
|
||||
t.Fatal("same domain should not need external auth")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The record the panel shows and the one a failed check suggests must be the
|
||||
// same string, or the operator is told two different things on one page.
|
||||
func TestMissingRecordChecksSuggestTheShownExample(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
@@ -50,11 +84,11 @@ func TestMissingRecordChecksSuggestTheShownExample(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("SPF advice %q does not suggest %q", spf.Detail, want)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dmarc := c.checkDMARC(context.Background(), "example.com")
|
||||
dmarc := c.checkDMARC(context.Background(), Query{Name: "example.com"})
|
||||
if dmarc.Status != health.StatusWarn {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("DMARC status = %q, want warn (%s)", dmarc.Status, dmarc.Detail)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if want := DMARCExample("example.com"); !strings.Contains(dmarc.Detail, want) {
|
||||
if want := DMARCExample(""); !strings.Contains(dmarc.Detail, want) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("DMARC advice %q does not suggest %q", dmarc.Detail, want)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user