store: users saved in one transaction, the last global kept inside it (audit M7, M9)
M7: DeleteUser counted the global users and then deleted; the handler's demotion and CreateGlobalUser checked and then wrote. MaxOpenConns(1) serialises statements, not pairs: two globals deleting or demoting each other at once could leave none. Now: - DeleteUser: a transaction that deletes first (taking the write lock) and then requires a global left (requireAGlobal) - ErrLastGlobal rolls back. - SaveUser: likewise for a demotion, the count inside the transaction after the write. The handler's early count stays only to answer before hashing a password; SaveUser decides, and ErrLastGlobal maps to the same message. - CreateGlobalUser: INSERT ... SELECT ... WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM users), one statement. M9: submitUserUpdate made five writes in a row (UpdateUser, sessions, SetUserRole, ClearUserReach with its error only logged, SetUserReach). store.SaveUser(UserChange) writes name, hash, e-mail, role and reach in one transaction (a global user's reach cleared); sessions end after it commits. The create path had the same flaw - user, reach and then e-mail in three writes - and now goes through AddUser, one transaction; CreateUser stays as a wrapper for its many test callers. SetUserRole is gone; writeUserReach is the reach write inside a transaction. Tests: store - two globals demoting, and deleting, each other from two goroutines: exactly one refused, one global left; a refused SaveUser (taken name, a reach to no domain, nothing assigned) changes nothing; promoted to global loses the reach; AddUser with a bad reach leaves no user; four setups at once create one user. Handlers (the users pages, direct): the whole change saved, back to domain with a reach; the last global not demoted and the typed rename not written; a domain user with nothing assigned refused, nothing changed; create with e-mail and reach. CHANGELOG [Unreleased], audit plan lines ticked (two), roadmap 17/62. Evidence: go vet ./... clean; go test ./internal/store ok; the users tests of ./internal/web/handlers ok; the server run follows before the push. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -663,10 +663,10 @@ has already run is never edited — the next file is added; the published
|
||||
installation; look). Tests: `Ops`/`ops` refused; the map written lower-
|
||||
case. Then verify Postfix's compare on the stand once (`MAIL FROM` as the
|
||||
other case) so the doc's claim is seen, not assumed. — **Opus**
|
||||
- [ ] **Last global in one transaction**: `DeleteUser`/`SetUserRole` take a
|
||||
- [x] **Last global in one transaction**: `DeleteUser`/`SetUserRole` take a
|
||||
`tx`, count and act inside it; `CreateGlobalUser` likewise. A concurrency
|
||||
test with two goroutines. — **Opus**
|
||||
- [ ] **`submitUserUpdate` in one transaction** (store method that takes the
|
||||
- [x] **`submitUserUpdate` in one transaction** (store method that takes the
|
||||
whole change). The users pages get direct handler tests while they are
|
||||
rewired - a row of review-2026-08-followups, placed here 2026-10-14. — **Opus**
|
||||
- [ ] **Import validates like the form**: route `DMARCRua`, IPs, limit mode,
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ in `git log` and [CHANGELOG.md](../CHANGELOG.md).
|
||||
| from-header-binding | Hold a message's `From:` header against the application that sends it | shipped `2.4.0` | 9/9 | [plans/from-header-binding.md](plans/from-header-binding.md) |
|
||||
| panel-redesign | Panel redesign (accepted mockups, design contract) | shipped `2.0.0` | 27/27 | [plans/panel-redesign.md](plans/panel-redesign.md) |
|
||||
| schema-squash | Squash SQLite migrations into a 2.x baseline | built in panel-redesign (stage 1) | — | [plans/panel-redesign.md](plans/panel-redesign.md) |
|
||||
| audit-2026-10-12 | Follow-ups of the 2026-10-12 full-tree code audit, seven stages | in progress (stage 0 shipped `2.4.2`; next stages 1+2 → `2.5.0`) | 15/62 | [audit-2026-10-12.md](audit-2026-10-12.md) |
|
||||
| audit-2026-10-12 | Follow-ups of the 2026-10-12 full-tree code audit, seven stages | in progress (stage 0 shipped `2.4.2`; next stages 1+2 → `2.5.0`) | 17/62 | [audit-2026-10-12.md](audit-2026-10-12.md) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended order** (not binding; owner, 2026-10-09: feature order follows
|
||||
development convenience): **panel-redesign** shipped as `2.0.0` (2026-10-11) and
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user