architecture § OpenDKIM becomes § DKIM signing (keys, the selector table and when it is rewritten, the two sockets, what is signed and the limits, the old tree); the process table, start order, liveness, the mail-path diagram, § Sender check, Persistence and the restore Resync follow the code. security.md: the panel signs with the login's key, the keys are the panel's alone, group selfpost and CAP_KILL as they are now; OpenDKIM's accepted risks go; new ones: what sendmail(1) submits is signed as the server, Sender: is signed but not judged (the owner's decision), and go-milter keeps every header per session, so the signer's 1 MiB refusal does not bound the library's copy. guide: Health, the container log's dkim-signer lines, backups, the long-line limit, and upgrading to 2.8.0 - with the rollback to 2.7.x: its start reads the queue as its own postfix (uid 101) before it hands the queue over, so the hand-over by name is run in the 2.7.x image first (measured on a copy of the test server's queue: postsuper failed before, passed after). development, README, SECURITY, product, the assumptions register's header: what left the image. entrypoint.sh: a comment, the rollback note as the guide gives it. Plan stage 3 lines ticked, roadmap 12/14. Written by four agents, one document each, against a brief of what the code does; reviewed here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
57 KiB
Security
What is here. (1) Mandatory requirements — the checklist v1.0 has to
meet; the full v1.0 audit passed. The pre-release review (plan § D, 2026-08-06)
covered the whole diff from the v1.0 audit (Phase 11) to HEAD and the checklist
in full: no exploitable findings; one defence-in-depth change — -- before the
login in the saslpasswd2 argv
(internal/app/sasl.go). The 2026-08-14 review
(code-review plan § P7, Fable; reviewer ≠ author) covered the P0–P1 diff of the
2026-08-13 full-tree review against this document — send-log authorization for
domain administrators, the atomic level-2 admit (tryAdmit), fail-closed
session creation, and application-delete ordering: no findings, and nothing
needed adding to the accepted risks. The 2026-08-19 review (Fable) covered the
whole diff from 1.3.0 (7052395) to HEAD past 1.9.1 — the inbound-relay path
(port 25, maps, panel), DMARC aggregate-report ingestion, automatic rate
limiting, application auth-IP allow-lists, and the new panel surface
(handlers, templates, settings): no exploitable findings; two deliberate
behaviours the pass examined are now recorded under Accepted risks
(unauthenticated DMARC ingest, fail-open auth-IP enforcement). The 2.0 review
(Fable, 2026-10-10; fixed and re-checked by other models) covered the route
rename, the /server/ subtree guard, inbound delegation and the new pages: no
Critical or High finding; sessions were keyed by user name (now by user id),
a password change ended other users' sessions, a password set for a user on
the user form did not end that user's sessions, internal errors reached forms a
domain user can open, and /static/ listed its files — all fixed
(see Authentication and sessions and Errors
shown to users); two deliberate behaviours are
recorded under Accepted risks (upstream of a delegated inbound domain, profile
saved without the password). The 2026-10-11 review (Fable) covered the DMARC
report path from port 25 to the report pages, which ran for the first time in
2.0.0 - the 2026-08-19 pass read code that Postfix could not yet start: no
Critical or High finding; a report's size was bounded only as bytes (now 5 000
records, 255 bytes a field), the retention cap was one for the whole server
(now per domain), the delivery command could run a hundred at once (now one),
and the reason logged for a dropped message carried the sender's bytes as they
came (now cut and reduced to printable ASCII). The 2026-10-12 reviews of
inbound-antispam-panel (2.1.0: the inbound journal milter, refusals read from
mail.log, the filter lists and their pages) were two, by different models
over the same diff. The technical one (Opus) found, outside the feature and
there since 1.9.0, that the level-2 rate limit and an application's
client-address list held only for the first message of a connection - see
Mail path - which was reproduced on the test
stand and fixed. The security one (Fable) found no Critical or High: a client's
HELO name could supply the sender, recipient and reply of a journal row, as the
parser then read the line, and so make a refusal look like the deny list's
(Postfix itself logs a HELO name with a space, <>()\";@ and non-printable
characters turned into ?; the reply now ends at Postfix's own ; from=<);
the journal's row cap was applied only every six hours, between which
refusals were written at whatever rate a stranger sent recipients (the
tailer now cuts to the cap every 500 rows); and two behaviours are recorded
under Accepted risks (the allow list keyed on an address anyone can claim, the
list files readable by anyone). A third it named - with the filter down, a
sender's own verdict headers were recorded as the filter's - was closed the
same day at the owner's suggestion: the filter signs each message and a
verdict is read only next to its signature. The 2026-10-16 security review of
panel-dkim-signing (2.8.0: the panel's own DKIM signer, OpenDKIM removed)
found no path by which an application gets another tenant's key or the
server's, or a valid signature over a From: a mail program reads as another
domain; no Critical or High. The signer held a message's whole header section,
bounded only by message_size_limit (now 1 MiB, refused above it); the old
key tree stayed readable by group selfpost and went into every backup (now
the panel's alone and left out); a hostname with capitals deferred every
notification (the server's name is kept in lower case for DKIM); only From
was over-signed (now the shown headers too) - all fixed. Sender: is now
signed but not held to the login, which waits for the owner; that and what the
header cap leaves are under Accepted risks.
(2) Accepted risks —
deliberate departures beyond the mandatory, recorded so the decision is not
lost.
Hardening beyond the mandatory (security headers, origin checking, __Host-
cookie with duplicate detection — Phase 14) is done; the history is in
CHANGELOG.md and git log.
Product boundaries: product.md. As-built design: architecture.md.
Mandatory requirements
The panel is exposed to the internet — the items below are not optional.
First-run administrator setup
- A one-time secret link
/setup/<token>, not an env variable holding a ready-made password hash. - Token ≥128 bits (
crypto/rand); mirrored to/data/setup-token. - Token lifetime — 10 minutes; after expiry, or after a restart with setup unfinished, it is regenerated and logged again.
- Rate limiting on
/setup/<token>per IP, separate from login. - Token comparison is constant-time (
subtle.ConstantTimeCompare). - Failed attempts do not invalidate the token early (protects setup from being DoS-ed).
- Once the administrator exists the token is void forever,
/setup/*→ 404. - The administrator password is bcrypt in SQLite only; no plaintext and no MD5.
PANEL_USERNAME/PANEL_PASSWORD_HASHin env are not used.
Application SASL passwords
- The panel generates the password on creation or reissue and shows it once.
- In
sasldb2it is stored in plaintext - Cyrus keepsuserPasswordas given (Cyrus SASL 2.1.28, lib/server.csasl_setpass()), and a domain export reads it back from there. The panel never shows it again: a lost password is reissued.sasldb2is as secret as the exports (§ Backup and domain export).
Input and configuration
- Server-side validation of addresses and domains (character whitelist); client-side validation does not count as protection.
- In address-list mode every address is checked to belong to the application's domain before it is written.
postfix reloadand anyexecrun without shell interpolation of user input; arguments are passed as separate elements.- Writes to config files are escaped (no injection of Postfix directives).
- The panel's HTTP server bounds every phase a client could hold it in: the
header 10 s, the request 30 s, the answer 60 s, an idle kept-alive
connection 2 min; a full backup download moves its own write limit to
two hours (
2.5.4).
Authentication and sessions
- Rate limiting on login (per IP, with lockout or delay). The Account form's
current-password check has a limit of its own, ten in 15 minutes per user,
so guesses there do not lock the address out of signing in (
2.5.4). - An unknown username is refused in the time a wrong password is: the sign-in
compares a bcrypt hash of the panel's work factor either way, so the delay
does not tell which names exist (
2.5.4). - Sessions: cryptographically random token; cookie
HttpOnly,Secure,SameSite. - Sessions live in SQLite (SHA-256 of the token, not the token itself); sliding
idle timeout (
PANEL_SESSION_IDLE_DAYS). - A session belongs to a user by id (
sessions.user_id, deleted with the user). The user is loaded on every request and a session is renewed only after it was found, so the cookie of a deleted user is dead and cannot become the session of whoever is created under the same name later; renaming a user leaves their sessions alone. - What ends a user's sessions: deleting the user (all); a password change on
Account (that user's other sessions — never another user's); a password set
for them by a global user on the user form (all of theirs, except the current
one when they set their own); signing out (the current one only); signing
in (the session the browser presented, if any - a token planted before the
sign-in is worth nothing after it,
2.5.4). There is no "sign out everywhere", and a restored backup brings back the session rows it held. - Polling by the monitoring screens (
HX-RequestGETs) does not renew a session.
Roles
Everyone who signs in to the panel is an administrator, so the two roles name a
reach, never a rank: global and domain (in the users list, the role
select, the page headers and these documents — not "admin"). A domain user is
assigned outbound domains and inbound domains separately, each list with
All (which includes domains added later and widens the list, not the role).
global |
domain |
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview, Server (Health, System log, Backup, Users, Settings, kit page) | yes | no — 404 |
| Outbound queue | yes | no — 404 (a queue is not filtered by domain) |
| Outbound: domain page, applications, Domain settings (report address, rate limit, export), log | every domain | assigned outbound domains |
| Outbound › DMARC reports | every report, with the server's ingest statistics | reports of assigned domains, without the ingest box |
| Inbound: domain page, upstream, recipients | every inbound domain | assigned inbound domains |
| Inbound › Log | every row, including those of a domain deleted since | rows of assigned inbound domains (by id: not those of an earlier domain of the same name), without the links into the filter lists |
| Inbound › Filter lists; the inbound log's retention | yes | no — 404 |
| Add or delete a domain, either direction; import a domain | yes | no |
| Account, Help | yes | yes |
- A path a user may not reach, a domain or application that does not exist, and one that belongs to another tenant answer the same 404, so the panel does not confirm what exists. A group with nothing assigned is absent from the user's menu.
/server/is guarded once, byglobalOnlywhere its routes are registered (a route outside the subtree cannot be added through that helper), and every handler checks again. Outbound and inbound handlers check per object (lookupDomain,requireInboundDomain) and lists are filtered by assignment in the query. Each denied path has a test for adomainuser, including another tenant's id.- The panel will not remove or demote the last
globaluser. The guard is inside the transaction that deletes or demotes: the write comes first and the count after it, so two administrators deleting or demoting each other at the same moment cannot both succeed; first-user setup is one statement that inserts only into an empty table. A user's name, password, e-mail, role and assignments are saved in one transaction, so a failure part way leaves no domain user with nothing assigned. - A log row - outbound or inbound - belongs to a domain by its id, written when the row is: the outbound row's from the application that sent it. A domain deleted and added again starts with an empty log for whoever it is assigned to; the rows of the deleted one are the global role's alone.
- A
domainuser can export an assigned domain, and an export carries the working application passwords (encrypted unless the box is unticked): assign domains with that in mind.
State-changing requests
- Every state change is a
POST; aGETnever changes state (the delete confirmation pages only render a form). - Every non-read request first passes the origin check
(
originAllowed, internal/web/security.go):Sec-Fetch-Sitemust besame-origin, orOriginmust name the panel's own host (the panel'sReferrer-Policyissame-origin, so a browser puts the panel's own origin on a form post of the panel); the session cookie isSameSiteas well. - There are no CSRF tokens. The decision, its price and the conditions for revisiting it are in the accepted risks and the ADR below.
Errors shown to users
A page shows a validation message (what to fix) and nothing else of an error. A
database, saslpasswd2 or Postfix-reload failure is logged and the page says
only that the change could not be saved and to check the logs. This holds on
every form a domain user can open. The global-only Backup page (full backup,
domain import) still shows the underlying message of an import failure, so the
operator can act on it.
Output and process
- Rendering goes through
html/templatewith auto-escaping (queue, log, journal, themes). - The panel process is not root (
user=panelin supervisord); path access is granted through theselfpostgroup with minimal permissions. The supervisord control socket, which can stop or restart any program, is thesupervisorgroup's, whose one member is the panel; Postfix sharesselfpostfor files and does not reach it (2.6.0; OpenDKIM sharedselfposttoo until2.8.0). - Group
selfpost(gid 10998) has two members,panelandpostfix. Through it Postfix reads what the panel writes -sasldb2and the maps under/data/postfix(2750, files 0640) - and connects to the panel's milter sockets in/run/selfpost(2750, sockets 0660); the panel readsmail.log, whichpostfixwrites, through it the other way (build/Dockerfile,build/entrypoint.sh). The DKIM keys are not in it (§ Mail path). - The container keeps
KILL(deploy/docker-compose.yml,cap_add; every other capability not listed there is dropped). Without it root cannot signal a process of another uid (kill(2), capabilities(7); measured on the test server, 2026-10-16), and two root processes must: supervisord stops and restarts the panel, and Postfix's master ends its children, which run aspostfix. Until2.8.0it also carried OpenDKIM'sUSR1reload through supervisord, which went with OpenDKIM; the plan had taken that for its only use, wrongly.
Mail path (security-relevant)
- Not an open relay — SASL only on 465/587;
reject_unauth_destination;smtpd_sender_login_maps+reject_sender_login_mismatch. - A recipient does not learn where an application runs (
2.7.0). TheReceived:header Postfix adds on 465 and 587 carries no client name, address, HELO name, TLS details or login (smtpd_hide_client_session=yes, the owner's decision of 2026-10-15): before, every message told its recipients the address and the internal host name of the machine the application sent from. What a complaint needs stays with the operator - the queue id in the header, the panel's log and smtpd'sclient=line in mail.log. Port 25 keeps the full header, as RFC 5321 requires of an MTA. - The panel signs, with the key of the login's domain (
2.8.0). The DKIM signer is a role of the panel process (internal/milter/sign.go,cmd/panel/signer.go) on two sockets of its own, both attached strictly (default_action=tempfail,build/postfix-config.sh).sign.sock, second insmtpd_miltersafter the sender check, signs what applications send on 465/587 with the key of the domain the SASL login belongs to:{auth_authen}, looked up in thesender_login_mapsfile Postfix itself reads (Bindings.DomainOf).sign-local.sock, the whole ofnon_smtpd_milters, signs what is submitted with sendmail(1) with the key of the server's own name. Nothing in a message chooses the key, and the socket a message comes through - not a missing login - decides that the server's key may sign it. What cannot be signed (a login with no domain, a name with no key, a read error) is deferred, never sent unsigned. Port 25 has no signer.relaxed/simple, rsa-sha256;h=names every header of RFC 6376 § 5.4.1's list the message has, andSenderandList-Unsubscribe-Post, then once more each of the shown ones present (Subject, Date, To, Cc, Reply-To, Sender) andFromlast, so one of those added after signing breaks the signature. Until2.8.0OpenDKIM signed - a 2018 beta with three 2026 CVEs open and nobody upstream to fix them (own-mta-builds § 1) - and chose the key by theFrom:header; it left the image, and with it the syslog relay and/dev/log, the port of itsFrom:parser, its tables and their reload by a signal across uids. Architecture § DKIM signing. - The DKIM keys are the panel's alone (
2.8.0). The key tree and the selector table the signer reads,/data/dkim/keys/<name>/<selector>.privateand/data/dkim/selectors(internal/domain,Keys), are owned bypanel, directories 0700 and files 0600 - no group, no other user; the signer reads them and never the database. The entrypoint sets these modes at every start (e2echeckDKIMTreeholds the tree to them). Until2.8.0the keys were under/data/opendkim, 2750/0640 in groupselfpostso that OpenDKIM could read them - and so could everypostfixprocess. That tree is kept for a rollback to 2.7.x until the next release; since2.8.0the entrypoint makes it the panel's alone as well (0700/0600, panel:panel) at every start, copies its keys as the panel user (setpriv) while/data/dkimholds none, and a backup leaves it out (§ Backup and domain export). A root step of the entrypoint follows no symbolic link the panel could plant in either tree (drop_links;cp -RP;chown -Randfinddo not follow one). - An application signs only as itself (
2.4.0). The signature'sd=is the login's domain, and a receiver holds it to the domain of theFrom:line (DMARC, RFC 7489 § 3.1.1): without a check of that line an application could still send under the server's signature as another domain of the server, or as the server itself. The panel's sender check holds the header to the table the envelope is held to and refuses anything else with550 5.7.1, a domain the server does not sign for included (the owner's rule: the header may say what the envelope may, nothing more). It is the first milter of the chain and strict: a message it could not judge is deferred, and one it refuses never reaches the signer. TheFrom:line must be one field holding one address in RFC 5322's grammar as Go'snet/mailreads it - a mail program's reading; a line a lenient program could show as another address (ceo@bank.com <me@mine.com>,<b@evil.com, a@mine.com>) is refused - and that address, its local part unquoted as Postfix unquotes the envelope's, is held against the application's bindings; its domain is compared in ASCII lower case only, so a look-alike such as the Kelvin sign forkis no letter of a registered domain (internal/milter/sender.go,judge,asciiLower). The unit test reads a list of lines naming another sender of the server in a quoted string, a comment, a quoted pair, capitals or an encoded word (internal/milter/testdata/from-lines-other.txt) and wants each refused or read as the application's own address; the e2e sends every line of a second list the check passes (from-lines-passed.txt, shared with the unit test) and wants it signed for the application's domain and no other. What this does not promise is what a display name looks like to a person: a name of another sender in it passes, signed with the application's own key - a forged display name is as old as mail, and no key of another's is involved. Nor does it look atSender:(Accepted risks). What the client wrote reaches the reply, the log and the send log only as printable ASCII, cut, and a refused message is one row of the log whatever its recipient count. Until2.4.0nothing held the header: OpenDKIM chose the key by it and Postfix holds only the envelope sender against the login, so an application of one sending domain could write another registered domain - or, since2.3.0, the server's own name - intoFrom:and have the message signed with that name's key (security review of panel-notifications, 2026-10-12). From2.5.2to2.8.0the check read the line with OpenDKIM's own parser, ported line for line, and refused an address over the 256 bytes OpenDKIM matched itsSigningTableagainst; with the key chosen by the login both went. Mail the panel submits itself does not pass the check: only root,postfixand the panel can submit locally (Accepted risks). Architecture § Sender check. - Inbound relay (optional,
INBOUND_RELAY_ENABLE) — port 25 is not an open relay either: SASL is off;smtpd_relay_restrictions/smtpd_recipient_restrictionsarereject_unauth_destinationandreject_unlisted_recipient; maps list only configured domains and recipients. Domains with no upstream host are omitted from the maps so mail is never accepted with nowhere to send it. Prefer recipient modelistto refuse unknown addresses at RCPT (no backscatter). Nothing signs on port 25. An optional antispam milter is inbound-only; default action is fail-open (accept). Since2.6.1the listener ends DATA only at the standard<CR><LF>.<CR><LF>(smtpd_forbid_bare_newline=normalize, the 2023 SMTP-smuggling defence, which Postfix 3.7 left off by default): a.line next to a bare newline is body, and what a smuggler would put behind it is delivered as part of the one message, not read as a second transaction. The submission ports keep the default. Since2.7.0the image runs Postfix 3.10.13, whose default isnormalizetoo (Postfix 3.9 and later;src/global/mail_params.h,DEF_SMTPD_FORBID_BARE_LF), so they end DATA the same way; the port-25 setting stays explicit. Before2.7.0a smuggled transaction on a submission port was still the authenticated session's, under its sender bindings and milters (own-mta-builds § 5). - The panel's milters judge every message of a connection. Postfix
introduces a client to a milter once per connection, and the milter library
replaces the milter's session after any reply that is not "continue". Until
2.1.0the journal milter knew the client's address only from that introduction, and both of its checks passed a message that came without one: a secondMAIL FROMafter a refused one, or any message after the first on one connection, got past the level-2 limit and past an application's client-address list. Now the address comes with everyMAIL FROM(milter_mail_macroscarries{client_addr}), the level-2 limit does not ask for it at all, an application with a client-address list is refused when no address is known, and neither milter replies anything but "continue" to a message it lets through.test/e2esends twoMAIL FROMon one connection. - The inbound journal is written from what strangers send. The inbound
journal milter is the last on port 25, read-only and attached fail-open; it
keeps of the filter's verdict only what its patterns recognise. A verdict
is read only next to the filter's signature. The filter is attached so
that mail flows when it is down, and then nothing removes verdict headers a
sender wrote himself. Nor would rspamd itself by default for a client it
counts as local - a private address, which every client has when Docker's
proxy relays port 25 - or an authenticated one:
skip_localandskip_authenticated(rspamd 3.11.1,milter_headers.lua,skip_wanted()) leave the sender's headers in place, while the signing routine below runs regardless; both are turned off inmilter_headers.conf(assumptions C-R7, tried on 2026-10-14). So rspamd adds a third header,X-SelfPost-Filter: the HMAC-SHA256 of the message's queue id under a key SelfPost generates (data/antispam/filter.key) and the sidecar reads from the directory it mounts. The journal milter recomputes it at end-of-message; with no signature, or one that does not fit, the row is that of mail nobody judged. The signature goes on to the upstream with the mail and is of no use there: it fits one queue id. Refusals are parsed frommail.logfrom the head of the line, with the reply ending at Postfix's own; from=<so that the HELO name after it - the client's text, which Postfix logs with non-printable characters and<>()\";@turned into?(Postfix 3.10.13, src/smtpd/smtpd.chelo_cmd()) - cannot stand in for the sender, the recipient or the reply; an address with a quote, a bracket or a space in it is not kept. Only a recipient at an inbound domain makes a row. The journal is cut to 10 000 rows every 500 rows the tailer writes, and by age every six hours. - Filter lists reach another container as files: values are whitelisted on
the way in (address, domain, canonical IP or network; no
/0, no IPv4-mapped network), the writer refuses a stored value with whitespace, a newline or#, and a change of the table and the rewrite of the six files are one step under a lock. - TLS is mandatory before credentials are transmitted (465 wrapper / 587
encrypt). TRUSTED_PROXY_CIDR— only explicitly trusted proxies may supplyX-Forwarded-Forfor login rate limiting; empty means XFF is ignored.
Backup and domain export
- Both files are secrets: a full backup carries DKIM keys,
sasldb2, the panel users' password hashes,docker-compose.yml,.env, and the TLS private key fromcerts/when present; a domain export carries the DKIM key and working application passwords in the clear (otherwise a transfer without recreating credentials would be impossible). The keys a backup carries are those of/data/dkim;/data/opendkim, the tree 2.7.x read and kept for a rollback, is left out (internal/backup,excludedFromArchive,2.8.0): an archive restores into its own version alone, and a second copy of every key - one that outlives a deleted domain's - has no place in it. - Links under
certs/(andcertsitself as a link) are followed, in the container's view: the archive carries whatever regular file they lead to that the panel's user may read.certs/is the operator's, mounted read-only; only someone who can write the project directory places a link there, and only a global user can download the archive (2.5.2). What a backup still leaves out - a link underdata/, a link undercerts/to a directory - it names in a warning, and acerts/with no file in it is refused rather than archived empty (2.5.3). - A backup is made only of the database that is there: a wrong
SELFPOST_DB_PATHis refused, and the snapshot opens the source read-only. An archive of an empty database would restore a server that offers its first-run setup - a new global administrator - while it holds live DKIM keys andsasldb2(2.5.3). - The first start after a restore opens nothing until
/datamatches the archive's last entry,data/contents.json(size and SHA-256 of each file underdata/): an archive unpacked in part - its manifest there, half its database - is refused (2.5.3). The check is integrity, not authenticity: whoever can write the project directory can write that record too. It reads only regular files at the recorded names (a link or a pipe there is refused, not followed), refuses a database journal file beside the restored database, and is made once per restore: a start after one that passed it and failed is not compared again while the manifest is the same. - Since 2.2.0 a full backup also carries, in the database, what Postfix logged
about each message still in the send log (
send_log_lines): the submitting client's address and SASL login, the message id, the receiving server and its reply.mail.logitself stays out of a backup; these lines are state the panel shows, kept for the send log's retention and no longer. - Both downloads are encrypted with a password unless the box on the form is
unticked (it is ticked by default):
scrypt (N=2¹⁵, r=8, p=1) → AES-256-GCM, streamed in 64 KiB chunks, each
authenticated with the header, the chunk number, and an end-of-stream flag —
a truncated or substituted file fails to open instead of silently restoring a
partial "tail", and bytes after the last chunk are refused (
2.5.3). The key-derivation parameters travel in the header, so a reader is bounded in what a header may ask before the password is checked: scrypt's array at most 128 MiB (four times what SelfPost writes), r ≤ 64 so the rest stays under 32 KiB, p ≤ 2 - Import a domain reads an uploaded file, and the old cap let a header ask for 4 GiB (2.5.3). Format and wrapper: internal/secretfile. - Extensions:
.spbk(SelfPost backup — full backup),.spde(SelfPost domain export — domain export); unencrypted files stay.tar.gz/.json. Domain import detects encryption by the file's magic bytes, not by extension. - The password is never stored: without it the file cannot be recovered. In the
CLI the password comes only from
SELFPOST_BACKUP_PASSWORDor-password-file, never as an argument (the process list is readable by any process in the container). - Minimum password length matches the administrator password (12): the file
sits offline and can be attacked without a time limit. The panel's forms and,
since
2.5.3, the CLI hold an encrypting password to it; decrypting takes any. - The CLI's
-o FILEis written beside its name and takes it only when whole, so a failure - a wrong password to-decryptamong them, which is checked on the first chunk before the output is touched - leaves the file that was there (2.5.3).
Accepted risks
An accepted risk is a decision with a condition for revisiting it, not a deferred item from the roadmap.
- A
POSTwith neitherSec-Fetch-SitenorOriginis allowed through. A client that sends neither — a genuinely old browser, or a webview with a frozen engine — stays vulnerable to CSRF from any site. Accepted deliberately: every panel user (roleglobalordomain) is an operator who picks their own browser, not an untrusted party the panel needs to defend against, and a strict mode would not "protect" such a client, it would simply break the panel in it. Tightening is one line inoriginAllowed(internal/web/security.go): returnfalseinstead oftruein the "neither header present" branch. That tightening is agreed (owner, 2026-10-13) as origin-strict; this bullet goes when it ships. - Session-bound CSRF tokens are not implemented. The origin check closes the
neighbouring-subdomain case but depends on browser behaviour; a token does
not. The price is a hidden field in roughly two dozen forms. The trigger to
revisit is a requirement for protection that holds regardless of the browser,
or a population of
domainusers the global user does not fully trust (see the ADR below). A token would not save the panel from XSS inside it either: code executing in the panel's origin sends the request itself — against that,html/templateauto-escaping and CSP do the work, which is why templates must contain no inline scripts and no inline styles. Decided by the owner on 2026-10-13: no tokens; the roadmap item that asked for them is dropped and the origin check is made strict instead (origin-strict). This bullet and the ADR below are the single record of the decision, and the ADR's Revisit if says when tokens are built after all. - Destructive-action confirmation (
data-confirm) is JavaScript-only. Delete, regenerate-password, and clear-rate-limit forms carry adata-confirmprompt handled entirely in panel.js; with JavaScript disabled or blocked the form submits immediately, exactly as it did before the prompts existed. Accepted deliberately: the prompt is a mis-click guard, not an authorization boundary — the same origin check and session/RBAC gate every one of thesePOSTs whether or not JavaScript ran. Progressive enhancement means the panel must work with JavaScript off; a server-rendered confirmation step would need a second page (or a?confirm=1round trip) for every one of these forms, which is what the delete pages (user_delete.html,out_domain_delete.html,in_domain_delete.html) already do for the highest-blast-radius deletes. - Encrypting backups and exports can be switched off. The panel's
Encrypt with a password box is ticked by default, but with it cleared the
file downloads in the clear, and the
selfpost-backupCLI writes a plain archive unless it is given a password. Otherwise an operator with nowhere to keep a password would lose the ability to take a backup at all, and a permanently undecryptable archive is worse than an unencrypted one: SelfPost does not store the password. The trigger to make encryption mandatory is a second administrator (at which point "who downloaded it" stops being one person). - A journal row left without delivery lines is closed as
bouncedrather than left as it is. The "foreverqueued" risk is gone:mail.logmoved to/data/log/and survives container recreation, and the log tailer keeps its read position (logtail_state), so the tail is read after a start. What remains are rows whose delivery lines are lost for good (the log rotated past 14 files while the panel was down, or was deleted): the reconciliation againstpostqueue -psees the message is not in the queue and after a 2-minute grace marks itbounced. If the message did in fact go out, the status is a false negative. Accepted deliberately: a delivery the panel cannot confirm must not be shown as confirmed, and a permanentqueuedis indistinguishable from "in flight right now". Reconciliation does not run until the tailer has read the log to the end, and touches nothing ifpostqueueis unreadable. See architecture.md § Log tailer. - DMARC aggregate reports are accepted without authentication. Anyone on
the internet can mail a fabricated report (or displace a genuine one — the
UNIQUE(reporter, report_id, domain)upsert is delete-then-insert) and skew the alignment statistics the panel shows. Inherent to howruaworks: reporters are arbitrary third parties and the mailbox address is published in DNS. The ingest already constrains the meaningful part — a report cannot be filed under a domain this instance does not host, and the claimed domain is cross-checked against the+tagof the delivery address (effective since 2.0.0: before it the recipient never reached the command) — and the data is advisory statistics only; nothing enforces off it. What a stranger can do is limited to a domain that chose a SelfPost-hosted address, through that address: file reports under it, replace one whose reporter and id they know, and fill that domain's 500 — not another domain's. A message that is not a report the relay keeps is dropped, not bounced (the envelope sender is the author's to write); a genuine report the parser cannot read is lost the same way, with a count and a line in the mail log. The trigger to revisit is any feature that lets report contents drive an automatic action (policy changes, rate limiting, alerting an operator into a config change). - The application auth-IP allow-list is enforced fail-open. The check runs
in the journal milter (
internal/milter/authip.go) withdefault_action=acceptand skips on store errors, so if the journal milter does not answer the restriction is not applied; the SASL login itself always succeeds. (While the milter is up the list holds for every message, and an unknown client address is refused - see Mail path; what is accepted here is the milter not answering. Since2.4.0a panel that is down altogether defers mail through the sender check, which shares its process; what is left of this window is a journal milter that hangs or a database that errs while the check beside it still answers.) This is documented in guide.md as not an authentication boundary — it is a blast-radius limiter for a leaked application password, on the same fail-open path as level-2 rate limiting, and a milter outage already stops the journal from recording sends at all. The trigger to revisit is a requirement for the allow-list to hold as a security boundary — at which point it must move to the SASL/smtpd layer and fail closed. - The key the spam filter signs with is readable by anyone on the host.
The inbound journal reads the filter's verdict only next to the filter's
signature (see Mail path), and the key for it,
data/antispam/filter.key, is 0644 like the list files beside it: the filter is another user in another container. Someone with a shell on the host could therefore sign a verdict of his own - into a monitoring page, on a host where he could do far more. Senders on the internet, whom the signature is for, cannot read it. Trigger to revisit: the same as for the list files - a shared host. - An allow entry for a sender address or domain trusts what the sending
server says. The filter matches the envelope sender (only that: a
bounce's
From:header is not looked at,extract_from = "smtp"), which is not authenticated: anyone who knows or guesses an allowed address can send as it and is given the entry's weight, which no spam score outweighs. The page's Help and the guide say so and recommend an entry for the client's address or network instead. Deny entries have no such problem - claiming to be a denied sender only gets mail refused - and deny wins over allow. Trigger to revisit: allow entries being used as the main way to receive mail from a sender, at which point the rule should also require the sender's SPF or DKIM to pass. - The filter lists are files readable by anyone on the host.
/data/antispamis 0755 and its six files 0644, unlike the rest of/data: the filter runs under another user in another container (rspamd as_rspamd, uid 11333, inrspamd/rspamd:3.11.1-3, measured on a live server, 2026-10-15; the panel is uid 10999 since2.7.0). They hold sender addresses, domains and networks - who the operator blocks and whom he lets through - but no message data. The inbound journal itself is in the database, which is 0600 since2.7.0(0644 before). Trigger to revisit: a shared host, where the sidecar should instead be given the files through a group it shares with the panel. An application can learn which domains are senders of this server.Struck in2.5.2(audit 2026-10-12, stage 2c; L8 closed): the sender check read aFrom:line with OpenDKIM's own parser, ported, and decided by the address OpenDKIM signed for; what a display name, a comment or a quoted local part names no longer mattered, so refused or passed said nothing about other domains of the server. Since2.8.0the check judges the one addressnet/mailreads and the signer takes the login's key, so the same holds without the port.A row of the inbound log belongs to a domain by name.Struck in2.5.0(audit 2026-10-12, L12): both logs now hold a domain by id, see § Roles.- Level-2 in-flight reservations can outlive a broken SMTP session until TTL.
Postfix tells the milters ABORT when a client drops the connection
mid-transaction (Postfix 3.10.13, src/smtpd/smtpd.c
mail_reset()->milter_abort()), and the journal milter releases the reservation then. When that never arrives - smtpd killed, the milter connection lost - go-milter has no close callback, and the in-memory reservation is released by TTL expiry, not immediately. The map is bounded by key and TTL (currently 10 minutes), so the effect is temporary over-counting on that app/domain key under churn. Accepted deliberately: immediate cleanup would require protocol hooks the current milter interface does not expose; the TTL bound keeps it finite. Trigger to revisit: sustained high-volume false throttling attributable to orphaned reservations. - Access to
mail.logfrom the unprivileged panel. The/data/logdirectory is2750 postfix:selfpostand the file is0640:postlogd(userpostfix) writes, the panel reads through the sharedselfpostgroup, and the file is inaccessible to others. The log holds envelope addresses and client IPs and SASL logins, theMessage-IDof each message and the replies given - for a refusedFrom:line the reply quotes it (printable ASCII, cut) - but no message bodies and no other headers; it is excluded from backups (log/is skipped) so that a dump stays state rather than diagnostics. Since 2.2.0 the tailer copies the lines of queued outbound messages into the database for the message's page, and those are in a backup (§ Backup and domain export); mail offered on port 25 is not copied. - The panel submits mail of its own. Notifications leave through
sendmail(1)run by the unprivileged panel user: a fixed argument list, the two addresses after--, no shell. The recipient is a panel user's account e-mail, validated when it was saved and checked again before it reaches a header or the command line; the subject and body are composed by the panel from its own readings. Two of those readings can carry text from outside - a DNS check's finding, and a queued message's sender address - and both are reduced to printable ASCII and cut before they are printed, so a notification's body can contain an address a stranger chose, as a few plain characters and nothing else. A refused-mail notification names the domain and the applications from the registry, never the domain a client wrote inMAIL FROM: that string is not yet held against the login when the milter refuses, and the first build took it for the subject - an application over its limit could have made the panel write a message per made-up domain, to another tenant's users among others (security review, 2026-10-12; fixed before release). The panel's membership inpostdropis what lets it submit: underno-new-privilegesthe setgid bit ofpostdropdoes not take, so only root,postfixand the panel can. Notifications are signed with a key of the server's own name and bypass the level-1 and level-2 limits. What bounds them: the subjects are the registered domains, the certificate and the queue; a domain's DNS can be reported and cleared about a dozen times a day at most by someone who flaps the zone; a domain's limits once a day; and no more than 60 messages leave in any hour whatever the rules arrive at. - Whatever is submitted with sendmail(1) is signed as the server. The
signer's local socket, the whole of
non_smtpd_milters, signs every message submitted locally with the key of the server's own name, whatever itsFrom:says, and no sender check stands on that path (2.8.0; under OpenDKIM a local message was signed for itsFrom:domain). Who can submit is what bounds it: root,postfix, and the panel throughpostdrop(the item above) - so any code running aspanel, the panel process anddmarc-ingest, which pipe(8) runs aspanel, can have a message signed as the server; the same code can read every key anyway, as it could in 2.7. Mail from the Internet never reaches the socket: smtpd runs its own milter list, and one whose list is empty (port 25 with DMARC reports on and the inbound relay off,-o smtpd_milters=) turnsnon_smtpd_miltersoff for what it receives (Postfix 3.10.13, src/smtpd/smtpd.c,setup_milters(), "Safety: disable non_smtpd_milters when not sending our own mail filter list"), and the applications on 465/587 have no code in the container. Trigger to revisit: anything else able to run aspanelorpostfixin the container, or a local submitter that is not the panel. - The sender check and the signer stop mail while the panel does not
answer. Both are roles of the panel process, attached with
default_action=tempfail, so a panel that is down or slower than the milter timeouts (15 s to connect and for a command, 30 s for the verdict at the end of the headers) defers every submission and its own notifications: availability of sending now depends on the panel, which it did not before2.4.0(until2.8.0the signer was OpenDKIM, attached as strictly, a process of its own). Chosen by the owner over the alternative, a check that is absent whenever the panel is - that one could be switched off by whoever can make the panel slow. Supervisord starts a panel that died again at once; one that dies within a second of starting is tried four times in a few seconds, and then SelfPost'scrashexitlistener takes the container down (supervisor 4.2.5,startretries=3); since2.6.0it does so too when the panel exits unexpectedly five times in ten minutes, however long each run lasted - so five malformed packets on a milter socket (the next item) restart the whole container. The outage is seconds or the whole instance; Server › Health counts the downtime and the mail deferred for it. Trigger to revisit: those numbers not staying at nothing - then the check moves into a process of its own (plans/from-header-binding.md). - A malformed packet on a milter socket of the panel ends the panel. The
milter library indexes into an empty packet and nobody recovers the panic,
so the process exits and supervisord starts it again. The sockets are
reachable only inside the container, by the group Postfix is in (mode
0660); the journal milter always had this, and since
2.4.0the seconds of the restart defer mail instead of passing it unjournalled (technical review, 2026-10-12). Trigger to revisit: anything untrusted able to open a Unix socket in the container. The container'sStruck in/dev/logtakes datagrams from any user in it.2.8.0: the syslog relay that read it from2.6.0existed for OpenDKIM's log, and left the image with OpenDKIM, as did the/dev/loglink; the signer logs to the panel's own output (the container log).- logrotate's state file is under
/data/log, thepostfixuser's directory: that user could stop rotation through it - as through the log itself, which it owns. Trigger to revisit: anything untrusted able to run in the container. - When the hostname is itself a sending domain, the server's mail is
signed with that domain's key. Whoever may export the domain has the key,
and its applications may send as
postmaster@<hostname>by right. The guide says so; a hostname that is nobody's sending domain avoids it. Sender:is signed but not held to the login (open: the owner's decision). Since2.8.0the signer signsSender:andResent-From:and over-signsSender:, so neither can be added or changed after the message leaves without breaking the signature; the sender check judgesFrom:alone (senderSession.HeaderkeepsFromandSubject). An application ofmine.comcan writeFrom: billing@mine.comandSender: ceo@bank.com: the check passes it, the signature isd=mine.com, DMARC aligns onFrom:and passes, and a mail program that showsSender:besideFrom:- Outlook as "on behalf of", by the review's account, not tried on this build - shows the other address. No key of another's is involved, as with a display name; until2.8.0the header was neither checked nor signed. The fix the security review of 2026-10-16 (F1) gives, and recommends: the check also readsSender:andResent-From:and refuses one whose single address the application may not send as, under the ruleFrom:is held to - a few lines ininternal/milter/sender.goand their tests. It changes what is refused (an application whose mail program writes aSender:of another domain today would be refused), hence the owner's decision; this item goes when it is taken.- A header section is bounded at 1 MiB by the signer, not by the milter
library. The signer counts a message's headers as Postfix hands them
over and refuses a section of more than 1 MiB with
552 5.3.4(internal/milter/sign.go,headerLimit;2.8.0): it keeps no more than that and drops its list once the block it signs is built, so its own memory per message is a few mebibytes at most. No mail program writes such a section, and the refusal is permanent, so a sender is told rather than retried. What the cap does not bound: go-milter v0.4.1 adds every header of a message to a map of its own in each milter it is sent to (session.go,CodeHeader), which none of SelfPost's milters reads - the sender check, the signer and the journal milter on 465/587, the inbound journal milter on port 25 - and that copy is bounded only by the port's message size limit (Postfix's default 10 240 000 bytes on 465/587;INBOUND_MESSAGE_SIZE_LIMITorDMARC_MESSAGE_SIZE_LIMITon port 25, from strangers), since a refusal at the end of the headers comes after they are all in. A message of nothing but headers still costs the panel about its size once per milter while it is in the milters, times the messages Postfix runs at once (as many as its cleanup processes,default_process_limit, 100), anddeploy/docker-compose.ymlsets no memory limit, so the host's out-of-memory killer chooses what goes; a panel killed is started again, and submissions wait meanwhile. The library's copy is older than2.8.0: every milter of the panel has had it. The fix, priced: a go-milter patched not to keep the map (vendored; SelfPost reads headers only throughHeader), or a memory limit in the compose file, which makes an exhausted panel a restart of the panel alone rather than a victim the host picks. Trigger to revisit: the inbound relay on an address strangers send to in volume, or a panel seen near the host's memory. - A message's page can show another message's log lines after a queue-id
collision. Postfix's short queue ids repeat: the id is the microsecond of
arrival and the queue file's inode, and inodes come round within seconds.
The page takes the stored lines of the row's queue id dated within the
row's own queue lifetime (about six days), so a second message has to get
the same microsecond on the same inode in that span - about one in a
million per reuse of the inode, and not something a sender can aim. When it
happens, a
domainuser could read the log lines of a message that is not theirs. The search of the currentmail.logthat the page did before 2.2.0 had the same exposure over a day. Trigger to revisit: a report of foreign lines on a page, or a reason to turn onenable_long_queue_ids, which ends it. - A
domainuser may point an inbound domain's upstream at any host and port. The upstream form checks that the host is a well-formed name or IP and the port is 1–65535; loopback, private and link-local addresses are allowed, so adomainuser with an assigned inbound domain can make this server's Postfix open SMTP connections to any address it can reach and hand mail for that domain to it. Accepted deliberately: delegation is within the trusted-operator model — adomainuser is an operator theglobaluser chose to give that domain, and the upstream of a backup-MX is by nature a host on someone's private network. The connection is made by Postfix and carries only mail for that domain; the panel itself makes no request to the upstream. Trigger to revisit:domainusers who are not trusted operators — the same condition as for CSRF tokens — at which point an allow-list of upstream networks, or restricting the field to the global role, is the fix. Since2.5.4an upstream has one TLS mode for every inbound domain forwarded to it (Postfix keys the policy by the next hop): adomainuser saving one that another tenant's domain uses with another mode is refused and told that mode - not the domain - so the form tells whether some domain forwards to a given host and port. Accepted with the rest of this item. - Account's profile (username, e-mail) is saved without the password.
Saving the profile does not ask for the current password, as changing the
password does. Since 2.3.0 the e-mail is where notifications go, so a stolen
session can turn them to another address: the thief then learns what they
say - which domain's DNS is wrong, which application is refused, when the
certificate expires, sender addresses of old queued mail - and the user
stops hearing it. Nothing in a notification gives access. A
domainuser can likewise point signed mail of this server at a third party's address, a dozen messages a day per assigned domain at most. The profile form also says when a username is taken, so a signed-in user can tell which usernames exist; signing in does not (2.5.4). It becomes a requirement to ask for the current password when changingusers.emailas soon as password-reset mails a link to it — from then on whoever can change the address could take the account over.
ADR: CSRF via origin checking, without tokens
Context. The panel is forms (POST) with a cookie session — the classic
CSRF surface. What is needed is a way to tell a request from the panel's own
page apart from one initiated by a third-party site in a logged-in user's
browser. The panel is multi-user since 1.2.0 (a global user plus
zero or more domain users, each scoped to their assigned domains), but
that is an authorization boundary (who can see or change what), not a change
to the CSRF threat: the attacker in scope here is still an external site
riding a legitimate user's cookie, not one panel user attacking another
through the browser.
Decision. originAllowed in
internal/web/security.go checks Sec-Fetch-Site
(when the browser sends it) or Origin (fallback) against the panel's host; a
request carrying neither header is allowed through rather than rejected.
There are no session-bound tokens embedded in forms. The check applies the same
way regardless of the requesting user's role.
Why not tokens. Cross-user CSRF is not the threat model here: a
domain user's browser sending a request still needs that user's own
cookie, so a token would not add a boundary between roles that the
authorization checks (Principal.CanAccessDomain,
internal/web/auth/principal.go; route
gating in internal/web/handlers/authz.go)
don't already enforce. The remaining case is an external site making a
logged-in user's browser send a request, which the origin check covers without
touching a single template.
A token would need a hidden field in roughly two dozen forms and
synchronisation with every new form, and it would still not protect against
XSS inside the panel — code executing in the panel's origin reads the token
and sends the request itself. XSS is handled by html/template auto-escaping
and CSP, so that is a separate line of defence, not a CSRF token.
Trade-off. A client that sends neither Sec-Fetch-Site nor Origin (a
genuinely old browser, or a webview with a frozen engine) stays vulnerable — see
"Accepted risks" above. This is a deliberate choice not to break the panel in
such a client, at the price of a narrow residual surface.
Revisit if: a requirement appears for protection that does not depend on
browser behaviour, or domain accounts stop being trusted operators (for
example, if a future release lets a global user invite domain users
whose browsers/devices are not vetted) — at that point cross-role request
forgery inside the panel would need its own analysis, separate from the
external-site case this ADR covers.
Decision of 2026-10-13 (owner). Asked to choose between this ADR, tokens, and a strict origin check, the owner chose the ADR with the strict check (origin-strict) and no tokens. Session-bound tokens are the answer to return to - a hidden field in every state-changing form and htmx path, checked against the session, on top of the origin check - when either condition above comes true, and also when: a browser the panel must support is found to send neither header or to send them wrongly; the panel gains a state-changing request that a browser sends without these headers; or an outside review requires a defence that the server alone holds.
How this list grows
The pre-release vulnerability review (history — CHANGELOG [0.5.0] Security)
closes every finding in one of two ways: a fix before the tag, or an entry here
with its rationale and its condition for revisiting, like the items above.
There is no third option ("we looked at it and moved on").