mix
5e5d157496
A bounce could be recorded as a successful delivery. The log-tailer's Fixed: - A bounce could be recorded as a successful delivery. The log-tailer's - Log-tailer resumes where it stopped instead of jumping to end-of-file on - Level-2 rate limit no longer overshoots under concurrency: messages that Changed: - The project has a single public home: `github.com/mixeme/selfpost`. Codeberg - Code comments no longer cite the archived specification. References like - `docs/code-review.md` is gone. Its plan is finished — phases 0 (bar the - `docs/architecture.md` gained a *Code layers* section: a diagram of - Phase 1 doc/code hygiene (`docs/code-review.md`): removed ~30 stale … (1 more in CHANGELOG) Security: - Pre-release security review (plan § D, model Fable, 2026-08-06): full pass - `saslpasswd2` argv: the application login is now passed after a `--` Added: - Optional password encryption for the two secret-bearing downloads (plan - Domain import accepts an encrypted export: the envelope is detected by its - `selfpost-backup` writes encrypted archives and reads them back: - `TestParseDelivery` covers the exotic mail.log shapes the review asked for - docs: README *Encrypting a backup or export*; `docs/security.md` § … (14 more in CHANGELOG) Removed: - docs: `security.md` — accepted risk «restore old backup revives session rows» Changed: - docs: `implementation-plan.md` trimmed to the sole open v1.x gate — pre-release - docs: `architecture.md` — sessions (SQLite, idle renew, password change), - docs: `development.md` — expanded e2e stack and `release.yml` matrix workflow. - docs: `security.md` — accepted risk for send-log rows stuck at `queued` after - docs: `roadmap.md` — optional send-log / `mail.log` follow-ups under v1.x tail. … (10 more in CHANGELOG) Full detail: CHANGELOG.md (0.5.0).
61 lines
2.0 KiB
Go
61 lines
2.0 KiB
Go
package dnscheck
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/mixeme/selfpost/internal/health"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestSPFExample(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
hostname string
|
|
ips []string
|
|
want string
|
|
}{
|
|
{"ipv4", "mail.example.com", []string{"203.0.113.10"}, "v=spf1 ip4:203.0.113.10 -all"},
|
|
{"both families", "mail.example.com", []string{"203.0.113.10", "2001:db8::1"},
|
|
"v=spf1 ip4:203.0.113.10 ip6:2001:db8::1 -all"},
|
|
// The hostname does not resolve, so there is no address to name; an "a:"
|
|
// mechanism still gives the operator a publishable record.
|
|
{"no addresses", "mail.example.com", nil, "v=spf1 a:mail.example.com -all"},
|
|
{"unparsable addresses", "mail.example.com", []string{"not-an-ip"}, "v=spf1 a:mail.example.com -all"},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if got := SPFExample(c.hostname, c.ips); got != c.want {
|
|
t.Errorf("SPFExample = %q, want %q", got, c.want)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The record the panel shows and the one a failed check suggests must be the
|
|
// same string, or the operator is told two different things on one page.
|
|
func TestMissingRecordChecksSuggestTheShownExample(t *testing.T) {
|
|
f := &fakeResolver{}
|
|
c := newTestChecker(f)
|
|
|
|
spf := c.checkSPF(context.Background(), Query{
|
|
Name: "example.com",
|
|
Hostname: "mail.example.com",
|
|
ServerIPs: []string{"203.0.113.10"},
|
|
})
|
|
if spf.Status != health.StatusError {
|
|
t.Fatalf("SPF status = %q, want error (%s)", spf.Status, spf.Detail)
|
|
}
|
|
if want := SPFExample("mail.example.com", []string{"203.0.113.10"}); !strings.Contains(spf.Detail, want) {
|
|
t.Errorf("SPF advice %q does not suggest %q", spf.Detail, want)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
dmarc := c.checkDMARC(context.Background(), "example.com")
|
|
if dmarc.Status != health.StatusWarn {
|
|
t.Fatalf("DMARC status = %q, want warn (%s)", dmarc.Status, dmarc.Detail)
|
|
}
|
|
if want := DMARCExample("example.com"); !strings.Contains(dmarc.Detail, want) {
|
|
t.Errorf("DMARC advice %q does not suggest %q", dmarc.Detail, want)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|