Follows the design commit before it (owner's words quoted there).
The lists' tables are Value, Kind, Matched and Remove. The kind tag
opens the entry's sheet: note, day added, how often it decided a
message in the days the log keeps, and the last match.
Matches are read off the journal on each view, nothing is stored
(inbound.Lists.Usage, store.ListSpamListHits). A row counts for an
entry when the list decided the message - a rejected row whose reply is
the deny rule's message, an accepted row whose verdict carries the
allow rule's symbol for that kind - and the entry fits the row's sender
or client address the way rspamd matches it: an address whole, a domain
as the sender's domain, a network containing the client (an
IPv4-mapped address as IPv4). A failure to count shows the lists with
"never" and logs why.
For that the journal milter keeps the lists' own symbols ahead of its
six-symbol cap: rspamd writes symbols heaviest first, so an allow
entry's -100 came last and was cut behind any six others.
The plan gains "Filter list usage": what counting from the journal
implies, and - the owner asked for it in writing - the conditions under
which a counter kept with each entry becomes worth a migration (the
journal cut by its row cap and not by age; a short retention; counts
that must outlive the journal; a slow page). multimap.conf says which
of its texts SelfPost reads back.
Tests: Usage over every kind on both lists and the rows that are
nobody's; the milter's symbol order; the store query; the page and its
sheets; a handler test from journal rows to the numbers on the page.
Seen: the fixture page with a sheet open, headless Edge at 1360 px -
the same as the accepted drawing.
Checked on the test server, uncommitted tree: go vet ./... ok,
go test ./... ok (22 packages), make e2e ok.
Not seen in a real run: a count above zero. It needs an entry added in
the panel, which I cannot sign in to, and then mail that the list
decides; in particular the deny rule's message arriving in mail.log as
the reply of a milter-reject line is what the trial with rspamc showed,
not yet what Postfix logged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
mixandClaude Opus 5.5
7192c3861e