selfpost/docs/security.md

Security

What is here. (1) Mandatory requirements — the checklist v1.0 has to meet; the full v1.0 audit passed. The pre-release review (plan § D, 2026-08-06) covered the whole diff from the v1.0 audit (Phase 11) to HEAD and the checklist in full: no exploitable findings; one defence-in-depth change — -- before the login in the saslpasswd2 argv (internal/app/sasl.go). The 2026-08-14 review (code-review plan § P7, Fable; reviewer ≠ author) covered the P0–P1 diff of the 2026-08-13 full-tree review against this document — send-log authorization for domain administrators, the atomic level-2 admit (tryAdmit), fail-closed session creation, and application-delete ordering: no findings, and nothing needed adding to the accepted risks. The 2026-08-19 review (Fable) covered the whole diff from 1.3.0 (7052395) to HEAD past 1.9.1 — the inbound-relay path (port 25, maps, panel), DMARC aggregate-report ingestion, automatic rate limiting, application auth-IP allow-lists, and the new panel surface (handlers, templates, settings): no exploitable findings; two deliberate behaviours the pass examined are now recorded under Accepted risks (unauthenticated DMARC ingest, fail-open auth-IP enforcement). The 2.0 review (Fable, 2026-10-10; fixed and re-checked by other models) covered the route rename, the /server/ subtree guard, inbound delegation and the new pages: no Critical or High finding; sessions were keyed by user name (now by user id), a password change ended other users' sessions, a password set for a user on the user form did not end that user's sessions, internal errors reached forms a domain user can open, and /static/ listed its files — all fixed (see Authentication and sessions and Errors shown to users); two deliberate behaviours are recorded under Accepted risks (upstream of a delegated inbound domain, profile saved without the password). The 2026-10-11 review (Fable) covered the DMARC report path from port 25 to the report pages, which ran for the first time in 2.0.0 - the 2026-08-19 pass read code that Postfix could not yet start: no Critical or High finding; a report's size was bounded only as bytes (now 5 000 records, 255 bytes a field), the retention cap was one for the whole server (now per domain), the delivery command could run a hundred at once (now one), and the reason logged for a dropped message carried the sender's bytes as they came (now cut and reduced to printable ASCII). The 2026-10-12 reviews of inbound-antispam-panel (2.1.0: the inbound journal milter, refusals read from mail.log, the filter lists and their pages) were two, by different models over the same diff. The technical one (Opus) found, outside the feature and there since 1.9.0, that the level-2 rate limit and an application's client-address list held only for the first message of a connection - see Mail path - which was reproduced on the test stand and fixed. The security one (Fable) found no Critical or High: a client's HELO name could supply the sender, recipient and reply of a journal row and so make a refusal look like the deny list's (the reply now ends at Postfix's own ; from=<); the journal's row cap was applied only every six hours, between which refusals were written at whatever rate a stranger sent recipients (the tailer now cuts to the cap every 500 rows); and three behaviours are recorded under Accepted risks (verdict headers while the filter is down, the allow list keyed on an address anyone can claim, the list files readable by anyone). (2) Accepted risks — deliberate departures beyond the mandatory, recorded so the decision is not lost.

Hardening beyond the mandatory (security headers, origin checking, __Host- cookie with duplicate detection — Phase 14) is done; the history is in CHANGELOG.md and git log.

Product boundaries: product.md. As-built design: architecture.md.

---

Mandatory requirements

The panel is exposed to the internet — the items below are not optional.

First-run administrator setup

• A one-time secret link /setup/<token>, not an env variable holding a ready-made password hash.
• Token ≥128 bits (crypto/rand); mirrored to /data/setup-token.
• Token lifetime — 10 minutes; after expiry, or after a restart with setup unfinished, it is regenerated and logged again.
• Rate limiting on /setup/<token> per IP, separate from login.
• Token comparison is constant-time (subtle.ConstantTimeCompare).
• Failed attempts do not invalidate the token early (protects setup from being DoS-ed).
• Once the administrator exists the token is void forever, /setup/* → 404.
• The administrator password is bcrypt in SQLite only; no plaintext and no MD5.
• PANEL_USERNAME / PANEL_PASSWORD_HASH in env are not used.

Application SASL passwords

• The panel generates the password on creation or reissue and shows it once.
• In sasldb2 it is stored in the form SASL requires (not plaintext held by the panel); a lost password can only be reissued.

Input and configuration

• Server-side validation of addresses and domains (character whitelist); client-side validation does not count as protection.
• In address-list mode every address is checked to belong to the application's domain before it is written.
• postfix reload and any exec run without shell interpolation of user input; arguments are passed as separate elements.
• Writes to config files are escaped (no injection of Postfix directives).

Authentication and sessions

• Rate limiting on login (per IP, with lockout or delay).
• Sessions: cryptographically random token; cookie HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite.
• Sessions live in SQLite (SHA-256 of the token, not the token itself); sliding idle timeout (PANEL_SESSION_IDLE_DAYS).
• A session belongs to a user by id (sessions.user_id, deleted with the user). The user is loaded on every request and a session is renewed only after it was found, so the cookie of a deleted user is dead and cannot become the session of whoever is created under the same name later; renaming a user leaves their sessions alone.
• What ends a user's sessions: deleting the user (all); a password change on Account (that user's other sessions — never another user's); a password set for them by a global user on the user form (all of theirs, except the current one when they set their own); signing out (the current one only). There is no "sign out everywhere", and a restored backup brings back the session rows it held.
• Polling by the monitoring screens (HX-Request GETs) does not renew a session.

Roles

Everyone who signs in to the panel is an administrator, so the two roles name a reach, never a rank: global and domain (in the users list, the role select, the page headers and these documents — not "admin"). A domain user is assigned outbound domains and inbound domains separately, each list with All (which includes domains added later and widens the list, not the role).

	global	domain
Overview, Server (Health, System log, Backup, Users, Settings, kit page)	yes	no — 404
Outbound queue	yes	no — 404 (a queue is not filtered by domain)
Outbound: domain page, applications, Domain settings (report address, rate limit, export), log	every domain	assigned outbound domains
Outbound › DMARC reports	every report, with the server's ingest statistics	reports of assigned domains, without the ingest box
Inbound: domain page, upstream, recipients	every inbound domain	assigned inbound domains
Inbound › Log	every row, including those of a domain deleted since	rows of assigned inbound domains (by name), without the links into the filter lists
Inbound › Filter lists; the inbound log's retention	yes	no — 404
Add or delete a domain, either direction; import a domain	yes	no
Account, Help	yes	yes

• A path a user may not reach, a domain or application that does not exist, and one that belongs to another tenant answer the same 404, so the panel does not confirm what exists. A group with nothing assigned is absent from the user's menu.
• /server/ is guarded once, by globalOnly where its routes are registered (a route outside the subtree cannot be added through that helper), and every handler checks again. Outbound and inbound handlers check per object (lookupDomain, requireInboundDomain) and lists are filtered by assignment in the query. Each denied path has a test for a domain user, including another tenant's id.
• The panel will not remove or demote the last global user.
• A domain user can export an assigned domain, and an export carries the working application passwords (encrypted unless the box is unticked): assign domains with that in mind.

State-changing requests

• Every state change is a POST; a GET never changes state (the delete confirmation pages only render a form).
• Every non-read request first passes the origin check (originAllowed, internal/web/security.go): Sec-Fetch-Site must be same-origin, or Origin must name the panel's own host; the session cookie is SameSite as well.
• There are no CSRF tokens yet. The decision, its price and the conditions for revisiting it are in the accepted risks and the ADR below.

Errors shown to users

A page shows a validation message (what to fix) and nothing else of an error. A database, saslpasswd2 or Postfix-reload failure is logged and the page says only that the change could not be saved and to check the logs. This holds on every form a domain user can open. The global-only Backup page (full backup, domain import) still shows the underlying message of an import failure, so the operator can act on it.

Output and process

• Rendering goes through html/template with auto-escaping (queue, log, journal, themes).
• The panel process is not root (user=panel in supervisord); path access is granted through the selfpost group with minimal permissions.

Mail path (security-relevant)

• Not an open relay — SASL only on 465/587; reject_unauth_destination; smtpd_sender_login_maps + reject_sender_login_mismatch.
• Inbound relay (optional, INBOUND_RELAY_ENABLE) — port 25 is not an open relay either: SASL is off; smtpd_relay_restrictions / smtpd_recipient_restrictions are reject_unauth_destination and reject_unlisted_recipient; maps list only configured domains and recipients. Domains with no upstream host are omitted from the maps so mail is never accepted with nowhere to send it. Prefer recipient mode list to refuse unknown addresses at RCPT (no backscatter). OpenDKIM is not attached on inbound. An optional antispam milter is inbound-only; default action is fail-open (accept).
• The panel's milters judge every message of a connection. Postfix introduces a client to a milter once per connection, and the milter library replaces the milter's session after any reply that is not "continue". Until 2.1.0 the journal milter knew the client's address only from that introduction, and both of its checks passed a message that came without one: a second MAIL FROM after a refused one, or any message after the first on one connection, got past the level-2 limit and past an application's client-address list. Now the address comes with every MAIL FROM (milter_mail_macros carries {client_addr}), the level-2 limit does not ask for it at all, an application with a client-address list is refused when no address is known, and neither milter replies anything but "continue" to a message it lets through. test/e2e sends two MAIL FROM on one connection.
• The inbound journal is written from what strangers send. The inbound journal milter is the last on port 25, read-only and attached fail-open; it keeps of the filter's verdict only what its patterns recognise. Refusals are parsed from mail.log from the head of the line, with the reply ending at Postfix's own ; from=< so that the HELO name after it - the client's text, logged as written - cannot stand in for the sender, the recipient or the reply; an address with a quote, a bracket or a space in it is not kept. Only a recipient at an inbound domain makes a row. The journal is cut to 10 000 rows every 500 rows the tailer writes, and by age every six hours.
• Filter lists reach another container as files: values are whitelisted on the way in (address, domain, canonical IP or network; no /0, no IPv4-mapped network), the writer refuses a stored value with whitespace, a newline or #, and a change of the table and the rewrite of the six files are one step under a lock.
• TLS is mandatory before credentials are transmitted (465 wrapper / 587 encrypt).
• TRUSTED_PROXY_CIDR — only explicitly trusted proxies may supply X-Forwarded-For for login rate limiting; empty means XFF is ignored.

Backup and domain export

• Both files are secrets: a full backup carries DKIM keys, sasldb2, the panel users' password hashes, docker-compose.yml, .env, and the TLS private key from certs/ when present; a domain export carries the DKIM key and working application passwords in the clear (otherwise a transfer without recreating credentials would be impossible).
• Both downloads are encrypted with a password unless the box on the form is unticked (it is ticked by default): scrypt (N=2¹⁵, r=8, p=1) → AES-256-GCM, streamed in 64 KiB chunks, each authenticated with the header, the chunk number, and an end-of-stream flag — a truncated or substituted file fails to open instead of silently restoring a partial "tail". Format and wrapper: internal/secretfile.
• Extensions: .spbk (SelfPost backup — full backup), .spde (SelfPost domain export — domain export); unencrypted files stay .tar.gz / .json. Domain import detects encryption by the file's magic bytes, not by extension.
• The password is never stored: without it the file cannot be recovered. In the CLI the password comes only from SELFPOST_BACKUP_PASSWORD or -password-file, never as an argument (the process list is readable by any process in the container).
• Minimum password length matches the administrator password (12): the file sits offline and can be attacked without a time limit.

---

Accepted risks

An accepted risk is a decision with a condition for revisiting it, not a deferred item from the roadmap.

• A POST with neither Sec-Fetch-Site nor Origin is allowed through. A client that sends neither — a genuinely old browser, or a webview with a frozen engine — stays vulnerable to CSRF from any site. Accepted deliberately: every panel user (role global or domain) is an operator who picks their own browser, not an untrusted party the panel needs to defend against, and a strict mode would not "protect" such a client, it would simply break the panel in it. Tightening is one line in originAllowed (internal/web/security.go): return false instead of true in the "neither header present" branch.
• Session-bound CSRF tokens are not implemented. The origin check closes the neighbouring-subdomain case but depends on browser behaviour; a token does not. The price is a hidden field in roughly two dozen forms. The trigger to revisit is a requirement for protection that holds regardless of the browser, or a population of domain users the global user does not fully trust (see the ADR below). A token would not save the panel from XSS inside it either: code executing in the panel's origin sends the request itself — against that, html/template auto-escaping and CSP do the work, which is why templates must contain no inline scripts and no inline styles. Tracked as csrf-tokens: implementing that item replaces this bullet and the ADR below, and dropping it leaves them as the single record of the decision. The two must not disagree.
• Destructive-action confirmation (data-confirm) is JavaScript-only. Delete, regenerate-password, and clear-rate-limit forms carry a data-confirm prompt handled entirely in panel.js; with JavaScript disabled or blocked the form submits immediately, exactly as it did before the prompts existed. Accepted deliberately: the prompt is a mis-click guard, not an authorization boundary — the same origin check and session/RBAC gate every one of these POSTs whether or not JavaScript ran. Progressive enhancement means the panel must work with JavaScript off; a server-rendered confirmation step would need a second page (or a ?confirm=1 round trip) for every one of these forms, which is what the delete pages (user_delete.html, out_domain_delete.html, in_domain_delete.html) already do for the highest-blast-radius deletes.
• Encrypting backups and exports can be switched off. The panel's Encrypt with a password box is ticked by default, but with it cleared the file downloads in the clear, and the selfpost-backup CLI writes a plain archive unless it is given a password. Otherwise an operator with nowhere to keep a password would lose the ability to take a backup at all, and a permanently undecryptable archive is worse than an unencrypted one: SelfPost does not store the password. The trigger to make encryption mandatory is a second administrator (at which point "who downloaded it" stops being one person).
• A journal row left without delivery lines is closed as bounced rather than left as it is. The "forever queued" risk is gone: mail.log moved to /data/log/ and survives container recreation, and the log tailer keeps its read position (logtail_state), so the tail is read after a start. What remains are rows whose delivery lines are lost for good (the log rotated past 14 files while the panel was down, or was deleted): the reconciliation against postqueue -p sees the message is not in the queue and after a 2-minute grace marks it bounced. If the message did in fact go out, the status is a false negative. Accepted deliberately: a delivery the panel cannot confirm must not be shown as confirmed, and a permanent queued is indistinguishable from "in flight right now". Reconciliation does not run until the tailer has read the log to the end, and touches nothing if postqueue is unreadable. See architecture.md § Log tailer.
• DMARC aggregate reports are accepted without authentication. Anyone on the internet can mail a fabricated report (or displace a genuine one — the UNIQUE(reporter, report_id, domain) upsert is delete-then-insert) and skew the alignment statistics the panel shows. Inherent to how rua works: reporters are arbitrary third parties and the mailbox address is published in DNS. The ingest already constrains the meaningful part — a report cannot be filed under a domain this instance does not host, and the claimed domain is cross-checked against the +tag of the delivery address (effective since 2.0.0: before it the recipient never reached the command) — and the data is advisory statistics only; nothing enforces off it. What a stranger can do is limited to a domain that chose a SelfPost-hosted address, through that address: file reports under it, replace one whose reporter and id they know, and fill that domain's 500 — not another domain's. A message that is not a report the relay keeps is dropped, not bounced (the envelope sender is the author's to write); a genuine report the parser cannot read is lost the same way, with a count and a line in the mail log. The trigger to revisit is any feature that lets report contents drive an automatic action (policy changes, rate limiting, alerting an operator into a config change).
• The application auth-IP allow-list is enforced fail-open. The check runs in the journal milter (internal/milter/authip.go) with default_action=accept and skips on store errors, so if the milter is down the restriction is not applied; the SASL login itself always succeeds. (While the milter is up the list holds for every message, and an unknown client address is refused - see Mail path; what is accepted here is the milter being down.) This is documented in guide.md as not an authentication boundary — it is a blast-radius limiter for a leaked application password, on the same fail-open path as level-2 rate limiting, and a milter outage already stops the journal from recording sends at all. The trigger to revisit is a requirement for the allow-list to hold as a security boundary — at which point it must move to the SASL/smtpd layer and fail closed.
• With the spam filter down, a sender can write his own verdict into the inbound journal. The filter is attached fail-open by default, and the inbound journal milter reads its verdict from two headers. Up, rspamd removes headers of those names that a sender wrote and adds its own (seen on the test server: a forged pair was replaced). Down, the sender's pair is all there is: the row shows his action and score, a forged quarantine shows a hold that never happened, and a forged allow symbol counts as a match of an allow entry that fits him in Filter lists. Mail is not affected - the journal decides nothing - and the page that says the filter is down is Server › Health. Accepted because the alternative is a live check of the filter on every message for the sake of a monitoring page. Trigger to revisit: the journal or the match counts being used to decide something (alerts, automatic removal of entries), or INBOUND_ANTISPAM_MILTER_ACTION staying accept on an installation whose filter is often down.
• An allow entry for a sender address or domain trusts what the sending server says. The filter matches the envelope sender, which is not authenticated: anyone who knows or guesses an allowed address can send as it and is given the entry's weight, which no spam score outweighs. The page's Help and the guide say so and recommend an entry for the client's address or network instead. Deny entries have no such problem - claiming to be a denied sender only gets mail refused - and deny wins over allow. Trigger to revisit: allow entries being used as the main way to receive mail from a sender, at which point the rule should also require the sender's SPF or DKIM to pass.
• The filter lists are files readable by anyone on the host. /data/antispam is 0755 and its six files 0644, unlike the rest of /data: the filter runs under another user in another container. They hold sender addresses, domains and networks - who the operator blocks and whom he lets through - but no message data. The inbound journal itself is in the database, 0640. Trigger to revisit: a shared host, where the sidecar should instead be given the files through a group it shares with the panel.
• A row of the inbound log belongs to a domain by name. A domain user sees the rows whose inbound domain has the name of one assigned to them, so an inbound domain that is deleted and added again shows its earlier rows to whoever it is assigned to next. Accepted: the journal is of a mail domain, and the rows age out with the retention.
• Level-2 in-flight reservations can outlive a dropped SMTP session until TTL. The journal milter cannot observe connection-close directly through go-milter, so if a client disconnects without an explicit Abort, its in-memory reservation is released by TTL expiry, not immediately. The map is bounded by key and TTL (currently 10 minutes), so the effect is temporary over-counting on that app/domain key under churn. Accepted deliberately: immediate cleanup would require protocol hooks the current milter interface does not expose; the TTL bound keeps it finite. Trigger to revisit: sustained high-volume false throttling attributable to orphaned reservations.
• Access to mail.log from the unprivileged panel. The /data/log directory is 2750 postfix:selfpost and the file is 0640: postlogd (user postfix) writes, the panel reads through the shared selfpost group, and the file is inaccessible to others. The log holds envelope addresses and client IPs, but neither message bodies nor headers; it is excluded from backups (log/ is skipped) so that a dump stays state rather than diagnostics.
• A domain user may point an inbound domain's upstream at any host and port. The upstream form checks that the host is a well-formed name or IP and the port is 1–65535; loopback, private and link-local addresses are allowed, so a domain user with an assigned inbound domain can make this server's Postfix open SMTP connections to any address it can reach and hand mail for that domain to it. Accepted deliberately: delegation is within the trusted-operator model — a domain user is an operator the global user chose to give that domain, and the upstream of a backup-MX is by nature a host on someone's private network. The connection is made by Postfix and carries only mail for that domain; the panel itself makes no request to the upstream. Trigger to revisit: domain users who are not trusted operators — the same condition as for CSRF tokens — at which point an allow-list of upstream networks, or restricting the field to the global role, is the fix.
• Account's profile (username, e-mail) is saved without the password. Saving the profile does not ask for the current password, as changing the password does. Today the e-mail is only the address the Use my e-mail button fills in, so a stolen session gains nothing it did not have. It becomes a requirement to ask for the current password when changing users.email as soon as password-reset mails a link to it — from then on whoever can change the address could take the account over.

ADR: CSRF via origin checking, without tokens

Context. The panel is forms (POST) with a cookie session — the classic CSRF surface. What is needed is a way to tell a request from the panel's own page apart from one initiated by a third-party site in a logged-in user's browser. The panel is multi-user since 1.2.0 (a global user plus zero or more domain users, each scoped to their assigned domains), but that is an authorization boundary (who can see or change what), not a change to the CSRF threat: the attacker in scope here is still an external site riding a legitimate user's cookie, not one panel user attacking another through the browser.

Decision. originAllowed in internal/web/security.go checks Sec-Fetch-Site (when the browser sends it) or Origin (fallback) against the panel's host; a request carrying neither header is allowed through rather than rejected. There are no session-bound tokens embedded in forms. The check applies the same way regardless of the requesting user's role.

Why not tokens. Cross-user CSRF is not the threat model here: a domain user's browser sending a request still needs that user's own cookie, so a token would not add a boundary between roles that the authorization checks (Principal.CanAccessDomain, internal/web/auth/principal.go; route gating in internal/web/handlers/authz.go) don't already enforce. The remaining case is an external site making a logged-in user's browser send a request, which the origin check covers without touching a single template. A token would need a hidden field in roughly two dozen forms and synchronisation with every new form, and it would still not protect against XSS inside the panel — code executing in the panel's origin reads the token and sends the request itself. XSS is handled by html/template auto-escaping and CSP, so that is a separate line of defence, not a CSRF token.

Trade-off. A client that sends neither Sec-Fetch-Site nor Origin (a genuinely old browser, or a webview with a frozen engine) stays vulnerable — see "Accepted risks" above. This is a deliberate choice not to break the panel in such a client, at the price of a narrow residual surface.

Revisit if: a requirement appears for protection that does not depend on browser behaviour, or domain accounts stop being trusted operators (for example, if a future release lets a global user invite domain users whose browsers/devices are not vetted) — at that point cross-role request forgery inside the panel would need its own analysis, separate from the external-site case this ADR covers.

How this list grows

The pre-release vulnerability review (history — CHANGELOG [0.5.0] Security) closes every finding in one of two ways: a fix before the tag, or an entry here with its rationale and its condition for revisiting, like the items above. There is no third option ("we looked at it and moved on").