mixandClaude Opus 5.5
be85cb71c9
Stage 3, step 1 (Opus). Each step of stage 2 was reviewed against its
mockup when it landed; this closes the review over the whole, after the
changes of stage 3 (Help topics and the ? on boxes, the three-choice
report address, row actions, the filter's socket).
- Evidence: all 29 screenshots under docs/assets/panel-redesign/
evidence/ are re-shot from the current templates - the 28 pages of
pageFixtures and the sign-in page without an administrator - 1440 px
wide at each page's full height. Headless Edge against the real
templates served locally with their fixtures; NOT from the container
(no Docker on this machine) - the container is checked on the test
server at deployment.
- panel/audit.js over the same 29 pages at 1440 and 1280: 4160 texts
checked, problems: [] (type floor, contrast, sideways scroll,
overflow in boxes and heads, scrolling tables, clipped card values,
missing icons). Every ? link has the form /help#topic, and
TestEveryHelpLinkLandsOnATopic proves each lands.
- Guards: outlines, class vocabulary, page structure, components-only,
stylesheet equality, routes, static allow-list - green; the ratchet
is empty.
Where the product knowingly differs from a mockup (each recorded in the
commit of its step): the queue is the postqueue listing, not a table;
the outbound log has no status filter; the message history has no
"accepted from IP" step; Health draws the sockets this server has;
the Spam filter box states only what the configuration says; the user
form's e-mail help promises nothing that is not built; Overview's title
does not claim that mail is flowing. Roadmap screens (in-log, in-queue,
in-quarantine, in-filter-lists, preflight) are drawn and not built.
Open with the owner: is-hidden, which panel.js sets at run time, is not
in check.py's Bulma subset (the edit of check.py is his).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
70 KiB
1440x900px
70 KiB
1440x900px
