docs: cut GitHub releases so the push mirror cannot delete them
GitHub is a pruning push mirror of Gitea, so a tag created by "gh release create" belongs to no upstream ref and disappears on the next synchronisation, orphaning the release and its archives. Document the order that survives it: push the tag to Gitea, wait for the mirror, verify the tag on GitHub, publish with --verify-tag. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -71,6 +71,13 @@ dragged.**
|
||||
authentication and takes the job with it, leaving a published release with no
|
||||
assets. The Project Layout section is gone — it duplicated ARCHITECTURE's
|
||||
package map and had drifted out of date.
|
||||
- **Cutting a GitHub release now documents the push mirror it has to survive.**
|
||||
GitHub is a pruning push mirror of Gitea, so `gh release create` creating the
|
||||
tag itself produces a tag Gitea does not know about, which the next
|
||||
synchronisation deletes — orphaning the release and taking its uploaded
|
||||
archives with it, without a single failed step to point at. The procedure is
|
||||
push the tag to Gitea, wait for the mirror, verify the tag on GitHub, then
|
||||
publish with `--verify-tag`.
|
||||
- **`docs/TESTS.md`** matches the suite it indexes again. It listed 130 tests
|
||||
against 170 in the tree, omitted four test files entirely, and named two tests
|
||||
that no longer exist. Every test function now appears exactly once, under the
|
||||
|
||||
+43
-3
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ Toolchain, dependency, build, and release information for contributors.
|
||||
- [Packaging](#packaging)
|
||||
6. [CI](#6-ci)
|
||||
- [Cutting a release](#cutting-a-release)
|
||||
- [Releasing through the GitHub push mirror](#releasing-through-the-github-push-mirror)
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Technology Stack and Tools
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -289,12 +290,19 @@ Before tagging:
|
||||
`main`, so the tag lands on a commit the forge actually has.
|
||||
|
||||
Then create and publish a release with a matching `v` tag on the forge (GitHub
|
||||
Releases / Codeberg releases). You can do that from the web UI or the CLI, e.g.:
|
||||
Releases / Codeberg releases). `origin` is the Gitea repository, and GitHub is a
|
||||
push mirror of it, so the tag is pushed to Gitea and reaches GitHub through the
|
||||
mirror — never created on GitHub directly (see
|
||||
[Releasing through the GitHub push mirror](#releasing-through-the-github-push-mirror)):
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git tag v0.11.5
|
||||
git push origin v0.11.5 # and to the Codeberg remote
|
||||
gh release create v0.11.5 --generate-notes # GitHub; publishes the release
|
||||
git push origin v0.11.5 # Gitea; and to the Codeberg remote
|
||||
|
||||
# wait for the mirror, then confirm GitHub actually has the tag
|
||||
git ls-remote --tags https://github.com/mixeme/gosentry.git v0.11.5
|
||||
|
||||
gh release create v0.11.5 --verify-tag --generate-notes # GitHub; publishes the release
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Publishing the release triggers the workflow: it strips the leading `v` from
|
||||
@@ -309,3 +317,35 @@ succeed, but the upload step fails on authentication and takes the job down with
|
||||
it, leaving a published release with no attached assets. GitHub needs no such
|
||||
setup: `softprops/action-gh-release` falls back to the built-in `GITHUB_TOKEN`,
|
||||
and the workflow already grants it `contents: write`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Releasing through the GitHub push mirror
|
||||
|
||||
The GitHub repository `mixeme/gosentry` is not a separate remote you push to; it
|
||||
is a push mirror driven by Gitea. Gitea mirrors with pruning, so every ref that
|
||||
exists on GitHub but not in Gitea is deleted on the next synchronisation.
|
||||
|
||||
This is what breaks the obvious way of cutting a GitHub release. `gh release
|
||||
create v1.0.0` creates the tag on GitHub when it is missing — a tag Gitea has
|
||||
never heard of. The next mirror run prunes it, GitHub orphans the release whose
|
||||
tag disappeared and turns it into a draft, and the release looks deleted on the
|
||||
Releases page. The archives go with it. Nothing reports an error: the workflow
|
||||
ran, the assets uploaded, and the release evaporated afterwards.
|
||||
|
||||
The order that works is therefore:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `git push origin <tag>` — the tag enters Gitea, which owns it.
|
||||
2. Wait for the mirror, or force it with **Settings → Repository → Mirror
|
||||
Settings → Synchronize Now** in Gitea.
|
||||
3. `git ls-remote --tags https://github.com/mixeme/gosentry.git <tag>` — confirm
|
||||
GitHub has it.
|
||||
4. `gh release create <tag> --verify-tag …` — `--verify-tag` is the guard, not a
|
||||
nicety: without it `gh` silently creates the doomed tag when the mirror has
|
||||
not caught up yet.
|
||||
|
||||
Release notes and assets are GitHub-side metadata; a mirror push cannot touch
|
||||
them, so once the release sits on a mirrored tag, later synchronisations leave
|
||||
it alone. Two consequences follow. Moving a published tag in Gitea force-pushes
|
||||
it on GitHub and leaves the release pointing at a different commit, and deleting
|
||||
a published tag in Gitea destroys the GitHub release along with its uploaded
|
||||
archives — neither is recoverable from the mirror side. Codeberg is unaffected:
|
||||
its releases live in the same forge as its tags.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user