main
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  mixandClaude Opus 5.5
|
be85cb71c9 |
panel-redesign: technical review - every page re-shot and audited
Stage 3, step 1 (Opus). Each step of stage 2 was reviewed against its
mockup when it landed; this closes the review over the whole, after the
changes of stage 3 (Help topics and the ? on boxes, the three-choice
report address, row actions, the filter's socket).
- Evidence: all 29 screenshots under docs/assets/panel-redesign/
evidence/ are re-shot from the current templates - the 28 pages of
pageFixtures and the sign-in page without an administrator - 1440 px
wide at each page's full height. Headless Edge against the real
templates served locally with their fixtures; NOT from the container
(no Docker on this machine) - the container is checked on the test
server at deployment.
- panel/audit.js over the same 29 pages at 1440 and 1280: 4160 texts
checked, problems: [] (type floor, contrast, sideways scroll,
overflow in boxes and heads, scrolling tables, clipped card values,
missing icons). Every ? link has the form /help#topic, and
TestEveryHelpLinkLandsOnATopic proves each lands.
- Guards: outlines, class vocabulary, page structure, components-only,
stylesheet equality, routes, static allow-list - green; the ratchet
is empty.
Where the product knowingly differs from a mockup (each recorded in the
commit of its step): the queue is the postqueue listing, not a table;
the outbound log has no status filter; the message history has no
"accepted from IP" step; Health draws the sockets this server has;
the Spam filter box states only what the configuration says; the user
form's e-mail help promises nothing that is not built; Overview's title
does not claim that mail is flowing. Roadmap screens (in-log, in-queue,
in-quarantine, in-filter-lists, preflight) are drawn and not built.
Open with the owner: is-hidden, which panel.js sets at run time, is not
in check.py's Bulma subset (the edit of check.py is his).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
mixandClaude Opus 5.5
|
2f1ec65b30 |
panel-redesign: Outbound log, message and the DMARC report pages on the kit
Stage 2, step 4. Written by Sonnet, reviewed by Opus.
- Five pages named after their mockups: out-log, out-message, dmarc,
dmarc-domain, dmarc-report, with typed page data
(view/outbound_log.go, dmarc.go), fixtures and tests. The engine
pages deliveries and delivery are gone with their templates; the
three DMARC templates are written anew. All five old names are off
legacy_pages.txt.
- The log polls its table (GET /outbound/log/fragment, as before); the
page count in the box foot follows out of band, and the filter in
the head is no longer swapped away while it is being chosen.
- Handlers pass typed data; routes, query parameters, filters, paging
and authorization are unchanged.
- Kit: Foot.ID / Foot.OOB (attributes only, as on Head) and Fact.Small,
the mockup's "sp-mono sp-small" value, for a report id and an rua
that wrapped mid-word in their column.
- test/e2e status scrapers match the new tag markup. Not run: no
Docker here.
Fixed on the way
- The DMARC domain page read a field its source rows do not have and
answered 500 as soon as the domain had a source. It builds the rows
from the store's rollup now, with a test.
Differences from the mockups, for the owner:
- the log has no Status filter (the store filters by domain and
application only); a refused message is "rejected", a neutral tag as
the mockup's "rate-limited" is;
- the message history keeps the panel's own wording with full dates and
has no "accepted from <IP>" step - the client address is not stored;
- dmarc: before the first report the box says "None yet" with what to
check; a quiet mailbox is an amber "quiet" tag;
- dmarc-domain: the stamp is pass / (pass + fail) rounded down, amber
on any failure, red when nothing passed, absent without mail;
- dmarc-report: the title has no year; "this relay" marks record rows
as well as sources.
Known and left as it is (not introduced here): the DMARC hub answers 404
to a domain administrator while the menu shows the entry and the plan
gives that role the reports of its own domains. Opening it needs the
report list to refuse an empty domain filter first - for the stage-3
security review.
Evidence
- docs/assets/panel-redesign/evidence/out-log.png, out-message.png,
dmarc.png, dmarc-domain.png, dmarc-report.png: 1440 px wide, headless
Edge, real templates served locally with their fixtures - NOT from
the container (no Docker on this machine).
- panel/audit.js on the five pages at 1440 and 1280: 784 texts checked,
problems: [].
- Polling of the log was exercised in a browser against a local
fixture server with document.hidden overridden: four polls, one
table and one foot after each, the filter untouched.
- go test -count=1 ./internal/web/... ./cmd/panel
ok internal/web
ok internal/web/auth
ok internal/web/handlers
ok internal/web/validate
ok internal/web/view
ok cmd/panel
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
