The side-by-side .split row read badly: main is capped at 48rem, so the
applications table had to live in roughly 27rem and its actions column
squeezed four controls into it.
Put the create form directly above the list instead — the order the
domains page already uses for "Add a sending domain" above "Domains" —
and delete .split, which nothing else used. The empty-state text follows
the same page's wording.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Same kind of control, two appearances: a POST wrapped in form.inline
(Re-check, Export domain, Sign out, New password, Delete), the <details>
toggles in the applications table and the a.danger delete links all
rendered as bold blue/red text, while every other action was a filled
button — sometimes both within one card, as on the backup page where
"Download full backup" was text and "Import domain" right below it was a
button.
Give them one vocabulary: filled for a card's own action, and a compact
outlined variant (the style the Copy buttons already used) where actions
cluster in a table row or the nav bar. An <a> is now only used for
navigation. The <details> summary keeps the pressed background instead of
a disclosure marker, and the row buttons are nowrap so a narrow actions
column widens rather than wrapping every label onto two lines.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
On the domain page the "Add an application" card sat below the domain rate
limit, so adding a login meant scrolling past the list and back. Move it up
next to the Applications table and wrap the pair in a .split grid (1.5fr /
1fr, so the table keeps the wider column). The columns collapse to one below
52rem, list first, and the grid gap keeps the same vertical rhythm as
.card + .card.
The empty-state text said "Create one below", which is no longer where the
form is; it now names the card instead of its position.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Groundwork for the Content-Security-Policy of phase 14.A. A policy that has to
allow inline script is not worth writing — script-src 'unsafe-inline' gives
back exactly the XSS foothold the policy exists to remove — so the three
inline constructs the templates still had are moved out first:
- the layout's <style> block becomes /static/panel.css;
- the one style="background:#b42318" attribute becomes the .danger class
that already existed for it;
- the four onsubmit="return confirm(...)" handlers become data-confirm,
handled by a delegated listener in panel.js. Delegation matters: the
application rows are also delivered by HTMX swaps.
htmx would otherwise inject a <style> of its own for the request-indicator
classes and become the single reason the policy needs an exemption; the panel
uses no hx-indicator, so the meta config switches it off.
A guard test keeps this from silently regressing later, which it otherwise
would: an inline handler added to a template does not fail, it just quietly
stops working in the browser.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
mix